Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama’s Syria policy in shambles as Assad opposition squabbles [View all]Alamuti Lotus
(3,093 posts)27. the "covert" intervention leads to brilliantly clumsy lies..
there's another excerpt from that same article that I read elsewhere. Somehow, even as jaded and untrusting as I have become, this small burst of epic stupidity surprised me:
"The director of cargo for Jordanian International Air Cargo, Muhammad Jubour, insisted on March 7 that his firm had no knowledge of any flights to or from Croatia.
This is all lies, he said. We never did any such thing.
A regional air traffic official who has been researching the flights confirmed the flight data, and offered an explanation. Jordanian International Air Cargo, the official said, is a front company for Jordans air force.
After being informed of the air-traffic control and transponder data that showed the planes routes, Mr. Jubour, from the cargo company, claimed that his firm did not own any Ilyushin cargo planes.
Asked why his employers Web site still displayed images of two Ilyushin-76MFs and text claiming they were part of the company fleet, Mr. Jubour had no immediate reply. That night the companys Web site was taken down."
This is all lies, he said. We never did any such thing.
A regional air traffic official who has been researching the flights confirmed the flight data, and offered an explanation. Jordanian International Air Cargo, the official said, is a front company for Jordans air force.
After being informed of the air-traffic control and transponder data that showed the planes routes, Mr. Jubour, from the cargo company, claimed that his firm did not own any Ilyushin cargo planes.
Asked why his employers Web site still displayed images of two Ilyushin-76MFs and text claiming they were part of the company fleet, Mr. Jubour had no immediate reply. That night the companys Web site was taken down."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The US, UK and France should never have started this armed regime change operation.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#1
We had one (the Petraeus-Clinton covert armed intervention), but that was shut down.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#3
We seem to largely agree: but, the end result may well be what was sought all along.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#5
Just as decay of the Austro-Hungarian & Ottoman Empires & the rush to fill those vacuums led to WW1
leveymg
Mar 2013
#8
Most think of WWI as a European war, but it really started in the Balkans & Turkey in 1912
leveymg
Mar 2013
#11
We largely agree, and where we disagree, are agreeable about it. That's all too rare. ;-)
leveymg
Mar 2013
#20
The Petraeus-Clinton program was a more direct covert arming of the opposition.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#23
I see the opposite--Obama's policy of standing back a little was validated.
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#6
If the opposition wins Syria will be a fundamentalist Islamic state with Sharia law.
L0oniX
Mar 2013
#10
I think the revolution was about the Gulf States seeing a chance to get rid of a rival.
Comrade Grumpy
Mar 2013
#30
Correct. Nothing is the default strategy, and very often the best strategy. nt
bemildred
Mar 2013
#13
If we make every nation's strife and civil war our business and responsibility, we're seriously
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#22