Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

primavera

(5,191 posts)
18. I don't know any way to detect all potential lunatics in advance...
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:31 PM
Mar 2013

... but I think there are steps that we could take that, together, would have some positive impact. Certainly universal background checks would be a place to start. Personally, I'd be open to something similar to the medical disclosure rules we have for impaired driving, e.g., if you have epilepsy, your physician has to report to the Department of Motor Vehicles that you have this condition and are not safe to drive until you've undergone treatment for the condition and have gone X number of months without having a seizure. It seems to me that it would not be so different to require psychologists to report patients with violent tendencies for purposes of being allowed to have a gun license. I think mandatory gun safety education could also be a place to detect persons who are perhaps not up for the responsibility of owning a firearm. For instance, you could require prospective gun owners to receive instruction and pass an exam, similar to what we require of drivers, and, if someone taking the test scribbles "Kill them all!" with his own blood, maybe not such a good person to be issued a license.

I think a lot of this could be prevented by simply having a different attitude about firearms. In most developed nations, firearm ownership is a privilege and a responsibility, so, if your fellow citizens perceive that you are failing to take that responsibility seriously and pose a hazard to yourself and/or others, societal attitudes about guns support reporting that person. Here, we believe gun ownership is an inalienable right to which one is entitled merely by virtue of breathing and no goddam government is going to tell us what we can or cannot do. If we cultivated societal attitudes towards gun abuses similar to those which we have achieved vis a vis drunk driving, maybe people would be more inclined to tell someone when they see their crazy neighbor emptying magazines in his backyard into an Obama effigy or whatever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Guns used for their primary purpose. onehandle Mar 2013 #1
In before the... bobclark86 Mar 2013 #2
But that's true Politicalboi Mar 2013 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Mar 2013 #32
Are you tired of DUers mocking Wayne LaPierre who says that after every massacre? denverbill Mar 2013 #38
It's no fun exercising your rights unless somebody notices. n/t bluedigger Mar 2013 #3
Another "responsible" gun owner. Hoyt Mar 2013 #5
Legally purchased. Law-abiding owner. Robb Mar 2013 #6
Ah, but that was yesterday primavera Mar 2013 #14
I'm kinda leaning toward nut under the radar. WCLinolVir Mar 2013 #17
I don't know any way to detect all potential lunatics in advance... primavera Mar 2013 #18
"He may have been drinking before the incident." tblue Mar 2013 #7
They don't want to get accused of stockpiling teh crazy. bluedigger Mar 2013 #8
WTF? Liberalagogo Mar 2013 #9
An AR-15's bullet can reach about three miles away. SunSeeker Mar 2013 #33
I swear, the typically laconic PNW has lost its damn mind! nolabear Mar 2013 #10
There isn't enough sunshine, is why it happens. freshwest Mar 2013 #16
no background checks needed according to LaPierre for guys like this wordpix Mar 2013 #11
What part of the background check would you assume disqualified him? WinniSkipper Mar 2013 #40
If only there were some other gun owners around to start firing randomly back ajk2821 Mar 2013 #12
Go right ahead with your shootout at the OK corral Demeter Mar 2013 #13
If only the garden gnomes had had guns, this would never have happened. - LaPierre n/t DRoseDARs Mar 2013 #15
"'The only way I'll leave is in a body bag" rdharma Mar 2013 #19
Society will be better off without him anyway. Generation_Why Mar 2013 #20
It's a good thing; greiner3 Mar 2013 #30
I believe the same was said in 1692 of Sarah Good... LanternWaste Mar 2013 #35
The guy is in custody. Archae Mar 2013 #21
Just another "responsible gun owner". Until he decided not to be. kestrel91316 Mar 2013 #22
According to multiple media reports cliffordu Mar 2013 #23
Sounds like... Archae Mar 2013 #24
Probably cliffordu Mar 2013 #25
You expect actual reporting, nowadays? Archae Mar 2013 #26
My expectation of any kind of real truth in reporting cliffordu Mar 2013 #27
for one thing KT2000 Mar 2013 #28
People that do not have mental health issues quaker bill Mar 2013 #34
Nothing more than a law-abiding gun owner exercising his second amendment rights Cali_Democrat Mar 2013 #29
I'm sure he's just standing his ground. valerief Mar 2013 #31
Now if everyone in that neighborhood had a gun... and-justice-for-all Mar 2013 #36
If only one of the local newspapers had been patriotic enough A Simple Game Mar 2013 #37
Nighty night: freshwest Mar 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gunman goes on shooting s...»Reply #18