Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(33,286 posts)
42. Could happen, as the Ohio AG will convene a grand jury to pursue further charges
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 05:38 PM
Mar 2013

for potential accessories to the Steubenville HS rape i.e. those who witnessed and failed to report, the coaches who heard about the incident but failed to report, etc.

Additionally as I have posted before, the 18-year-old students charged face anywhere from 9 months to 20 years in prison per Connecticut law of 2nd-degree sexual assault. (see this in-depth local newspaper article for more info about the 18-year-olds charged for the rapes.) This 17-year-old boy will face charges of " second-degree assault and risk of injury to a minor." However, he's being tried in juvenile court, so he might be sentenced to just 1 or 2 years or until his 21st birthday, similarly to how the Steubenville rapists were sentenced.

From these two stories the two 18-y/o suspects are all charged with these crimes:
- 2nd degree sexual assault
- risk of injury to a minor with sexual contact
- risk of injury to a minor

Chapter 939, section 53, title 21 describes risk of injury to minor:

(a) Any person who (1) wilfully or unlawfully causes or permits any child under the age of sixteen years to be placed in such a situation that the life or limb of such child is endangered, the health of such child is likely to be injured or the morals of such child are likely to be impaired, or does any act likely to impair the health or morals of any such child, or (2) has contact with the intimate parts, as defined in section 53a-65, of a child under the age of sixteen years or subjects a child under sixteen years of age to contact with the intimate parts of such person, in a sexual and indecent manner likely to impair the health or morals of such child...shall be guilty of a class C felony for a violation of subdivision (1)...of this subsection and a class B felony for a violation of subdivision (2) of this subsection...


So if the adult suspects are convicted at least two of these charges and serve their sentences consecutively not concurrently, they could face anywhere from 1.5 to 40 years in state prison! in that regard CT general statute chapter 952, section 53a, title 37 says: "When a person is sentenced for two or more counts each constituting a separate offense, the court may order that the term of imprisonment for the second and subsequent counts be for a fixed number of years each. The court in such cases shall not set any minimum term of imprisonment except under the first count, and the fixed number of years imposed for the second and subsequent counts shall be added to the maximum term imposed by the court on the first count."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What is it with High School football? liberal N proud Mar 2013 #1
TWO WORDS Zoonart Mar 2013 #4
This kind of thing has been going on for far longer than that Tempest Mar 2013 #6
That was before we decided the only way to handle social problems was to criminalize them. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #35
So CRIMES like rape are mere SOCIAL PROBLEMS? WTF???? nt alp227 Mar 2013 #41
This appears to be a case of statutory rape. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #49
Wow, and if she was 12? No "criminalization" is okay either? bettyellen Mar 2013 #55
And if she were 14? Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #65
so you have a one year issue with the "line" which - of course- cannot be "fuzzy" bettyellen Mar 2013 #73
Welcome to DU wryter2000 Mar 2013 #9
Have a nice nap? UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #13
I smell zombies. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2013 #26
2008 was a good year to join DU UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #28
No, just someone who didn't post much for a time muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #31
Um.... jeff47 Mar 2013 #15
No evidence naaman fletcher Mar 2013 #17
That claim is not backed by evidence. redqueen Mar 2013 #43
Yes it is backed by evidence naaman fletcher Mar 2013 #54
lol... D'Amato. Of course. redqueen Mar 2013 #58
So naaman fletcher Mar 2013 #61
You cited one study, and I posted just a FEW of the reasons why it's flimsier than rice paper. redqueen Mar 2013 #62
You posted nothing naaman fletcher Mar 2013 #68
Corelation does not mean causation One_Life_To_Give Mar 2013 #63
True, that correlation does not equal causation naaman fletcher Mar 2013 #69
And Highway speeds are up while traffic deaths are down. One_Life_To_Give Mar 2013 #70
I see so porn only affects foot ball players in such a manor? L0oniX Mar 2013 #19
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #23
Only if they're SoCalNative Mar 2013 #52
This isn't a new thing rbixby Mar 2013 #27
You blame internet porn rather than BAD PARENTING?? kestrel91316 Mar 2013 #36
Yes and I'm not alone Zoonart Mar 2013 #45
NO NO NO! SkyDaddy7 Mar 2013 #51
People used to marry off their children at 13 in this country like chattel. Ash_F Mar 2013 #60
It happened in the past NewJeffCT Mar 2013 #7
Yep. And it wasn't just the high school jocks that were having sex with underage girls. Arkansas Granny Mar 2013 #12
More like what's wrong with boys/men 16-25. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #8
What do you expect in this sick culture? Moostache Mar 2013 #25
Well said !!! RKP5637 Mar 2013 #29
FYI Mosby Mar 2013 #48
If you choose to defend the banks, that's on your conscience... Moostache Mar 2013 #50
hero worship mopinko Mar 2013 #11
It's where the sociopaths hang out TrogL Mar 2013 #24
I think a lot of it has to do with the attitude of the coaches and principals. winter is coming Mar 2013 #33
I beleive you are correct. Mopar151 Mar 2013 #76
this is an ongoing obscenity. niyad Mar 2013 #2
What is wrong with the upbringing of these jocks. In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #3
Yes, it is more than peer pressure. nt redqueen Mar 2013 #44
Clearly: Parents and society are to blame! Something must change. Now. In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #47
I hope some of the school officials NewJeffCT Mar 2013 #5
Could happen, as the Ohio AG will convene a grand jury to pursue further charges alp227 Mar 2013 #42
There is so much money involved in high scool and college sports now tblue37 Mar 2013 #10
There is not a lot of money in Torrington HS football NewJeffCT Mar 2013 #14
Coaches and administrators, even in small HS programs, tend tblue37 Mar 2013 #16
I don't think it's money naaman fletcher Mar 2013 #18
Rape, guns and war. God bless Ammeddicca ...the gahdreat saatan! L0oniX Mar 2013 #20
There is an issue that continues to be overlooked in these incidents. Blackjackdavey Mar 2013 #21
There's no doubt teenage drinking is behind many tragedies. radicalliberal Mar 2013 #34
I don't disagree with any of this Blackjackdavey Mar 2013 #39
In Glen Ridge, they weren't jocks and they weren't drunk. redqueen Mar 2013 #46
1st off rtracey Mar 2013 #22
Yep, it was at a party and there was definitely drinking. lark Mar 2013 #30
And there it is. Blackjackdavey Mar 2013 #37
And inevitably there is bullying and blaming of the victims muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #32
It seems like it's usually gang rape. Why? Isn't one enough? radicalliberal Mar 2013 #38
Rape is always wrong! In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #40
I apologize for my first comments. I was speaking sarcastically. radicalliberal Mar 2013 #57
Seriously. I understood where you were coming from in the heat of anger. In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #59
How true, how true . . . radicalliberal Mar 2013 #66
These are issues that I have been fighting for years even though In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #67
The seventies ushered in a new era of jockdum olddots Mar 2013 #53
Wow ... chervilant Mar 2013 #56
Wow.. sendero Mar 2013 #64
All of us, chervilant Mar 2013 #71
I don't think .. sendero Mar 2013 #72
Arguing? chervilant Mar 2013 #74
We'll see if this turns into another Stubenville davidpdx Mar 2013 #75
disgusting Skittles Mar 2013 #77
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Four CT Football Players ...»Reply #42