Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bubbayugga

(222 posts)
37. Not killing him is a mistake. Lack of consequences will just encourage others to do the same thing
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 07:46 AM
Mar 2013

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Would this avoid a full trial? I'm not familiar with Colorado law. slackmaster Mar 2013 #1
It's up to the prosecution to accept, or they can reject and go for the DP Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #3
So he was willing to inflict death but doesn't want to receive it? SharonAnn Mar 2013 #2
No deal. Give him a fair trial then kill him. Peter cotton Mar 2013 #4
It's better for the relatives of the victims, and better for the taxpayers if he just pleads xtraxritical Mar 2013 #21
this seemed to me the inevitable outcome arely staircase Mar 2013 #5
well even before being arraigned Homes tried to "settle" for life with no parole Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #7
i can understand them not jumping at this notorious person's first offer arely staircase Mar 2013 #9
Is he even lucid at this point? /nt Ash_F Mar 2013 #6
Is there any reason to think that he is not lucid? HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #8
Well, for one thing a judge plead not guilty for him on his behalf. Ash_F Mar 2013 #10
Why assume I'm a smart ass? You do yourself a disservice HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #12
Then I guess you just didn't read the article before posting. Ash_F Mar 2013 #13
On one hand I am against the death penalty. alp227 Mar 2013 #11
Prosecutors should accept this plea offer. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #14
It also keeps the relatives of the victims from reliving the horror and xtraxritical Mar 2013 #22
Colorado is practically a death penality abolitionist state. joshcryer Mar 2013 #23
I am against the death penalty iandhr Mar 2013 #15
The fucking coward. Third Doctor Mar 2013 #16
Take the Plea. It's Pretty Well Known it Costs More to Give Someone the DP than Life w/o Parole dballance Mar 2013 #17
In the case of Nathan Dunlap, the entire process was reviewed, Tender to the Bone Mar 2013 #18
He's obviously mentally ill struggle4progress Mar 2013 #19
obvious to everyone. But even many liberals have thrown away rational behavioral science for Douglas Carpenter Mar 2013 #24
Take the deal. Seeking Serenity Mar 2013 #20
It's either take the deal or be found NGRI, most likely Samurai_Writer Mar 2013 #25
Why would he be found NGRI? LisaL Mar 2013 #26
Mentally ill might not 'equal' legally insane Samurai_Writer Mar 2013 #27
I have no idea as to what makes you think he didn't know right from wrong. LisaL Mar 2013 #28
Planning doesn't equal knowing right from wrong Samurai_Writer Mar 2013 #29
While I don't believe for one second he is legally insane. LisaL Mar 2013 #30
Even if found NGRI, he would never get out Samurai_Writer Mar 2013 #31
I've seen it happen one too many times to believe that. LisaL Mar 2013 #32
Can you cite even one case? Ash_F Mar 2013 #36
I'm pretty sure they could get an easy conviction without the deal Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #35
One condition: He submits to psychiatrists for study. Festivito Mar 2013 #33
Brilliant idea - it might help us figure how why Justice Mar 2013 #38
He doesn't want to die fine. Kalidurga Mar 2013 #34
Not killing him is a mistake. Lack of consequences will just encourage others to do the same thing bubbayugga Mar 2013 #37
The death penalty would be too good for this guy. Arkana Mar 2013 #39
I understand and sympathize that the victims want a trial for the purpose of justice.... Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»James Holmes offers guilt...»Reply #37