Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ms.smiler

(551 posts)

4. YvonneCa, I can’t say that I truly understand the role of Title insurers in all of this.

Reply to YvonneCa (Reply #3)

Fri Feb 3, 2012, 11:18 PM

Feb 2012

They were part of the formation of MERS and yet they have a liability because of the conduct of the banks and MERS.

I’ve heard that Title policies are now written to permit Title insurers an “out” but haven’t researched present day policies so I’ve seen nothing with my own eyes.

I wouldn’t be surprised though if Title companies sought a reason to deny claims.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NY's Schneiderman sues banks in foreclosure effort [View all] kpete Feb 2012 OP

k&r.. May all the threads unravel they way they ought!. . .n/t annabanana Feb 2012 #1

Here is a link to the Complaint: ms.smiler Feb 2012 #2

Any thoughts about why title... YvonneCa Feb 2012 #3

YvonneCa, I can’t say that I truly understand the role of Title insurers in all of this. ms.smiler Feb 2012 #4

Thank you for the thoughtful... YvonneCa Feb 2012 #5

Sounds carla Feb 2012 #6