Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New York's Cardinal Dolan says gay people are 'entitled to friendship' only [View all]happyslug
(14,779 posts)83. Because the Catholic Church OPPOSES cuts in Domestic Spending? They Defend labor rights?
We are profoundly concerned that the allocation for non-defense discretionary spending be large enough to maintain current commitments to poor persons. Cuts in this allocation, which includes many domestic and international poverty-focused programs, will have a disproportionate impact on vulnerable families.
This is especially true of the dramatic cuts envisioned in the House Budget resolution.
Non-defense discretionary spending that serves poor and vulnerable people includes but is not limited to:
Head Start; Emergency Food and Shelter Program; improved workforce training and development;
safe and affordable housing;
the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, which provides vital assistance to poor families in the nations capital in seeking out high-quality education for their children;
as well as poverty-focused international assistance programs that save lives, treat and prevent disease, make farmers more productive, help orphans, feed victims of disasters, and protect refugees, enhancing global security.
The House proposed budget drastically cuts mandatory programs (not including Social Security, health care programs, civil service pensions, farm programs, and interest payments) by about $800 billion over ten years, relative to current law. This figure is very concerning, since 70 percent of the spending in this budget category goes for programs to help poor and vulnerable people. Programs in this category include programs that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has consistently supported:
Pell Grants;
the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps);
the Supplemental Security Income program (SSI) for the aged and disabled people in poverty;
School lunches and other child nutrition programs;
the Earned Income Tax Credit and the low income component of the Child Tax Credit;
and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
This is especially true of the dramatic cuts envisioned in the House Budget resolution.
Non-defense discretionary spending that serves poor and vulnerable people includes but is not limited to:
Head Start; Emergency Food and Shelter Program; improved workforce training and development;
safe and affordable housing;
the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, which provides vital assistance to poor families in the nations capital in seeking out high-quality education for their children;
as well as poverty-focused international assistance programs that save lives, treat and prevent disease, make farmers more productive, help orphans, feed victims of disasters, and protect refugees, enhancing global security.
The House proposed budget drastically cuts mandatory programs (not including Social Security, health care programs, civil service pensions, farm programs, and interest payments) by about $800 billion over ten years, relative to current law. This figure is very concerning, since 70 percent of the spending in this budget category goes for programs to help poor and vulnerable people. Programs in this category include programs that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has consistently supported:
Pell Grants;
the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps);
the Supplemental Security Income program (SSI) for the aged and disabled people in poverty;
School lunches and other child nutrition programs;
the Earned Income Tax Credit and the low income component of the Child Tax Credit;
and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/federal-budget/upload/Budget_Resolutions_FY2014-2013-03-18.pdf
http://usccb.org/news/2013/13-053.cfm
http://usccb.org/
They also support worker's right to organize:
You point out that Pope Benedict XVI, in Caritas in Veritate, states, The repeated calls
for the promotion of workers' associations that can defend their rights must therefore be honoured today even more than in the past. (#25) In Laborem Exercens, Pope John Paul II calls labor associations an indispensable element of social life, especially in modern industrialized societies, but also reminds unions to secure the just rights of workers within the framework of the common good of the whole of society.
http://usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/labor-employment/upload/Archbishop-Listecki-support-FINAL.pdf
Thus they are a tremendous ally to Labor and Economic Progressives, who put the above above gays rights IF they have to make a choice (and often you have to, when you are looking at potential allies in any political fight).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New York's Cardinal Dolan says gay people are 'entitled to friendship' only [View all]
Redfairen
Mar 2013
OP
And the Catholic Church should no longer be allowed tax exempt status, but still have our friendship
still_one
Mar 2013
#1
I have a feeling the new Pope, will be clamping down on such militant statements.
Katashi_itto
Apr 2013
#78
Because the Catholic Church OPPOSES cuts in Domestic Spending? They Defend labor rights?
happyslug
Apr 2013
#83
Also men who have had vasectomies and women who have had their tubes tied.
kestrel91316
Mar 2013
#28
And when it comes to little boys, Catholic priests definitely aren't entitled to fondle them.
olddad56
Mar 2013
#9
Who's fault is that? Has the church EVER taken responsibility for the coverup or even the problem?
6000eliot
Mar 2013
#55
And everyone is entitled to be safe in their person, and to the belief that God loves them. . .
Journeyman
Mar 2013
#11
What a piece of shit Dolan is, his Church institutionally guilty of crimes so great he should
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2013
#15
You mean some of them are not bigots but they behave like they are because everyone else does
idwiyo
Apr 2013
#88
That's all backwards because the clergy is already optional icing on the wedding cake.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2013
#41
You aren't entitled to dictate civil rights in the US, my dear Mr. Dolan. So STFU.
kestrel91316
Mar 2013
#27
Why do people listen to these assholes at all? They just enablers for these clowns. nt
valerief
Mar 2013
#29
It is disappointing to hear and see such disdain for another himan, it is like saying God
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#33
Dolan and the Catholic Church are not impressed with science and evidence.....
Swede Atlanta
Mar 2013
#48
The only thing I grasp is I never made some decision to be heterosexual. I just am.
olegramps
Apr 2013
#80
The only thing he's entitled to is me giving him the finger along with a big
jerseyjack
Mar 2013
#56
The Washington Post quotes Dolan saying"its defense of marriage is not reduced to an attack on gays"
happyslug
Apr 2013
#76
So basically, his position is only defensible if we lived in a Catholic theocracy...
Humanist_Activist
Apr 2013
#93