Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 01:22 PM Feb 2012

Russia, China reject UN move to rebuke Syrian president [View all]

http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/04/10317567-russia-china-reject-un-move-to-rebuke-syrian-president

Updated at 12 p.m. ET: Amid fresh bloodshed in the Syrian city of Homs, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday failed to pass a resolution calling on the Syrian president to step down.

Russia and China vetoed the resolution endorsing an Arab League call for Bashar Assad to leave power. The other 13 council members, including the U.S., France and Britain, voted in favor of the resolution.

The vote took place as Syrian forces pummeled the city of Homs with mortar and artillery fire that activists say killed more than 200 people in one of the bloodiest episodes of the uprising against Assad's regime. The U.N. says more than 5,400 people have been killed over almost 11 months in a Syrian government crackdown on civilian protests.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/world/middleeast/syria-homs-death-toll-said-to-rise.html?_r=1&hp
(snip)
The Security Council voted 13 to 2 in favor of a resolution backing an Arab League peace plan for Syria, but the measure was blocked by Russia and China, who opposed what they saw as a violation of Syria’s sovereignty.

(snip)
Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, said that Moscow still had two objections to the latest revised resolution: that it did not place sufficient blame for the violence on the opposition, and that it unrealistically demanded that the government withdraw its military forces back to their barracks.

He told a security conference in Munich that adopting the current resolution would risk “taking sides in a civil war.” In a television interview quoted by the Itar-Tass news agency, he said that ignoring Russia’s objections would result in “another scandal.”

(snip)
“The scandal is not to act,” Peter Wittig, the German ambassador to the United Nations, said. “The scandal would be failure to act.”
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dictators stick together. former9thward Feb 2012 #1
Of course they do! Iliyah Feb 2012 #2
Once bitten twice shy dipsydoodle Feb 2012 #3
13 of the 15 members supported it, including tabatha Feb 2012 #4
This was the predicted outcome all along. All those people dead in order to weaken leveymg Feb 2012 #5
Come on. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #35
The removal of Kadaffy was largely opportunistic. Regime change in Syria has been long planned leveymg Feb 2012 #38
Where is it? CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #39
There are several overlapping models of regime change and outcomes. leveymg Feb 2012 #43
Sounds to me like total catastrophic failure on all levels. Why is Obama going along with it? CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #46
Unlike Bush in Iraq, we can't attribute it to either lack of intellect or intelligence at the top. leveymg Feb 2012 #48
Well... CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #54
Stalling tactic to give more time for Assad's repression to work. Good to see every other country pampango Feb 2012 #6
Well it so far seem to be working in Bahrain -- n/t mazzarro Feb 2012 #7
Dictatorial governments installed largely by help from the USA dipsydoodle Feb 2012 #9
It won't work and eventually they'll resort to a Georgia-style action. joshcryer Feb 2012 #18
are honestly trying to peddle the globally-debunked claptrap that Russia first attacked Georgia? stockholmer Feb 2012 #28
Nope. joshcryer Feb 2012 #30
United Russia's(the Moscovian equivalent of our Republicans) time may be running out, though. AverageJoe90 Feb 2012 #21
That's not true. David__77 Feb 2012 #22
And your proof is? AverageJoe90 Feb 2012 #32
Amnesty Int.: Double veto of draft Security Council Resolution on Syria a betrayal of protesters pampango Feb 2012 #8
"Betrayal" is a strong word. Why should Russia or China have any loyalty to some "protesters"? Fool Count Feb 2012 #31
Well, any pretense that Russia and China have joined the civilized world WestSeattle2 Feb 2012 #10
What do you expect from a country that runs over its people with tanks? Dr_Scholl Feb 2012 #11
Russia and China can go fuck themseves! Odin2005 Feb 2012 #12
See Burma 2008. joshcryer Feb 2012 #19
China needs to be booted out of the UNSC, and Russia given a strict warning to CUT THAT SHIT OUT. AverageJoe90 Feb 2012 #33
How many resolutions lsewpershad Feb 2012 #13
No one here mentions US blocking Israeli sanctions? radhika Feb 2012 #14
I hate the US's protecting Israel, too. This isn't either/or. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #23
The UN is morally bankrupt DUIC Feb 2012 #15
Putin doesn't want his own people to get any ideas, Syria is his puppet state. Baclava Feb 2012 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Centrik Feb 2012 #17
Good news! David__77 Feb 2012 #20
LOL, you probably think Freedom is Slavery, too. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #24
I do not think that theocracy is freedom. David__77 Feb 2012 #25
Neither is a dictatorship. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #26
Unless it is a US/UK/NATO supported dictatorship, then its all unicorns and ponies stockholmer Feb 2012 #27
I don't support US-backed dictatorships. False dichotomy. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #29
C'mon, Dave, you seriously believe this? AverageJoe90 Feb 2012 #34
It's the "anything the West does is evil" brigade. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #36
You forgot to accuse me of loving Saddam Hussein. David__77 Feb 2012 #40
I call it cheerleading murders and thugs. Kurska Feb 2012 #41
What's this nonsense you post? David__77 Feb 2012 #45
LOL, calling BS when you support, say, China's policies in Tibet... Odin2005 Feb 2012 #42
You pile more McCarthyism on. David__77 Feb 2012 #44
In any thread involving Tibet you always agree with the propaganda... Odin2005 Feb 2012 #50
I support the position of the UN and the US that Tibet is a part of China. David__77 Feb 2012 #51
What about what the TIBETANS want??? Odin2005 Feb 2012 #52
I hop eit does not come here. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #55
Well that's ... predictable. (nt) Posteritatis Feb 2012 #47
Exactly the same way that christx30 Feb 2012 #49
It never changes in US foreign policy Gringostan Feb 2012 #37
once again Centrik Feb 2012 #53
Navalny in Yale University Yalling Feb 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia, China reject UN m...