Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Russia, China reject UN move to rebuke Syrian president [View all]
http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/04/10317567-russia-china-reject-un-move-to-rebuke-syrian-presidentUpdated at 12 p.m. ET: Amid fresh bloodshed in the Syrian city of Homs, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday failed to pass a resolution calling on the Syrian president to step down.
Russia and China vetoed the resolution endorsing an Arab League call for Bashar Assad to leave power. The other 13 council members, including the U.S., France and Britain, voted in favor of the resolution.
The vote took place as Syrian forces pummeled the city of Homs with mortar and artillery fire that activists say killed more than 200 people in one of the bloodiest episodes of the uprising against Assad's regime. The U.N. says more than 5,400 people have been killed over almost 11 months in a Syrian government crackdown on civilian protests.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/world/middleeast/syria-homs-death-toll-said-to-rise.html?_r=1&hp
(snip)
The Security Council voted 13 to 2 in favor of a resolution backing an Arab League peace plan for Syria, but the measure was blocked by Russia and China, who opposed what they saw as a violation of Syrias sovereignty.
(snip)
Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, said that Moscow still had two objections to the latest revised resolution: that it did not place sufficient blame for the violence on the opposition, and that it unrealistically demanded that the government withdraw its military forces back to their barracks.
He told a security conference in Munich that adopting the current resolution would risk taking sides in a civil war. In a television interview quoted by the Itar-Tass news agency, he said that ignoring Russias objections would result in another scandal.
(snip)
The scandal is not to act, Peter Wittig, the German ambassador to the United Nations, said. The scandal would be failure to act.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This was the predicted outcome all along. All those people dead in order to weaken
leveymg
Feb 2012
#5
The removal of Kadaffy was largely opportunistic. Regime change in Syria has been long planned
leveymg
Feb 2012
#38
Sounds to me like total catastrophic failure on all levels. Why is Obama going along with it?
CAPHAVOC
Feb 2012
#46
Unlike Bush in Iraq, we can't attribute it to either lack of intellect or intelligence at the top.
leveymg
Feb 2012
#48
Stalling tactic to give more time for Assad's repression to work. Good to see every other country
pampango
Feb 2012
#6
are honestly trying to peddle the globally-debunked claptrap that Russia first attacked Georgia?
stockholmer
Feb 2012
#28
United Russia's(the Moscovian equivalent of our Republicans) time may be running out, though.
AverageJoe90
Feb 2012
#21
Amnesty Int.: Double veto of draft Security Council Resolution on Syria a betrayal of protesters
pampango
Feb 2012
#8
"Betrayal" is a strong word. Why should Russia or China have any loyalty to some "protesters"?
Fool Count
Feb 2012
#31
China needs to be booted out of the UNSC, and Russia given a strict warning to CUT THAT SHIT OUT.
AverageJoe90
Feb 2012
#33
Unless it is a US/UK/NATO supported dictatorship, then its all unicorns and ponies
stockholmer
Feb 2012
#27