Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

4. Yeah, even though none of the technologies are even close to working.

Reply to maddezmom (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2012, 04:51 PM

Feb 2012

Why bother. If any country launches one, it's a shit storm in the making. MAD actually does work. When it stops working, none of us will be around to talk about it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NATO: Going ahead with missile shield despite Russian concerns, threats [View all] maddezmom Feb 2012 OP

Quick before the Soviet Union comes back, encourage them to go Communist with "defenses" MACARD Feb 2012 #1

I dont get why it cant be a joint operation. Muskypundit Feb 2012 #2

Because the MIC does not WANT a friendly co-op venture with Russia Hugabear Feb 2012 #3

Yeah, even though none of the technologies are even close to working. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #4

MAD does work, but only if all parties are sane. Flatulo Feb 2012 #5

Well one thing is for sure - the name. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #6

Rasmussen is the head of NATO??? Boombaby Feb 2012 #7

The US MIC tried to develop a missile defense system in the 1980's called SDI or "Star Wars". AdHocSolver Feb 2012 #8

This is a total waste of money. David__77 Feb 2012 #9

It doesn't matter if it will perform like intended jakeXT Feb 2012 #10

Why do we still have NATO? XemaSab Feb 2012 #11

Russia acts like they're pissed tabasco Feb 2012 #12