Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

earthside

(6,960 posts)
4. Talk of cuts to Social Security won't help.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:23 AM
Apr 2013

With the bulge of baby boomers headed for retirement in the next few years, and with a vast majority of them with little or no retirement funds, the last thing we need to do is talk about or actually cuts to Social Security or Medicare.

This kind of talk by the President, in my estimation, just foster even more of a hunker down attitude: don't spend if you can help it; pay down debt instead of saving; be very financially conservative; etc.

If we want to stimulate the economy to create a future with more jobs, Obama ought to be talking about increasing Social Security and Medicare benefits --- that's the kind of reform we need. That would make a lot of 50-somethings feel a lot more secure about the future and perhaps willing to spend more.

Of course, we could cut the ridiculous military spending to help pay for increasing Social Security benefits.

So, I'm still supporting sequester for the time being -- Social Security isn't touched by it and the military is actually seeing some cuts for a change.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

no surprise, since the republicans have been blocking every jobs program proposed still_one Apr 2013 #1
Wow! You can see when George Bush Junior became president on that graph. loudsue Apr 2013 #2
Welcome to DU, Jim Rob alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #3
Mucho's Gracis, Amigo! n/t Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #5
I don't know who this "Mucho" might be, or why he possesses a "Gracis" alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #6
LOL. n/t Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #10
Talk of cuts to Social Security won't help. earthside Apr 2013 #4
I largely agree with you. Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #7
What impact does baby boomer retirements have on labor force participation rates? denverbill Apr 2013 #8
None, nor should they. Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #9
That's absolutely false alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #13
Well yes and no dmallind Apr 2013 #15
There are certainly interpretations to be made regarding the number...I was addressing the poster's alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #16
We have less people working now than in 1980... lib2DaBone Apr 2013 #11
maybe the sequester will help Enrique Apr 2013 #12
Only 6M of whom want a job, and only 3M of whom have looked ONCE in a year. dmallind Apr 2013 #14
Baby Boomer here. I dropped out... I retired OKNancy Apr 2013 #17
It's those lazy worker's fault that there are no jobs librechik Apr 2013 #18
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #19
the private sector is doing fine. quadrature Apr 2013 #20
You're kidding Right? Munificence Apr 2013 #21
The private sector is doing fine? OhioChick Apr 2013 #22
Locking, sorry, this is a duplicate. Please continue discussion and post updates here: Rhiannon12866 Apr 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»People Not In Labor Force...»Reply #4