Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(25 posts)

9. None, nor should they.

Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:54 AM

Apr 2013

It wouldn't make sense to calculate the rate based on retiree's retiring. It's about those who were or are looking for work who are not employed.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Welcome to DU, Jim Rob alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #3

Mucho's Gracis, Amigo! n/t Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #5

I don't know who this "Mucho" might be, or why he possesses a "Gracis" alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #6

LOL. n/t Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #10

Talk of cuts to Social Security won't help. earthside Apr 2013 #4

I largely agree with you. Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #7

None, nor should they. Jim.Rob58 Apr 2013 #9

That's absolutely false alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #13

Well yes and no dmallind Apr 2013 #15

We have less people working now than in 1980... lib2DaBone Apr 2013 #11

maybe the sequester will help Enrique Apr 2013 #12

Baby Boomer here. I dropped out... I retired OKNancy Apr 2013 #17

It's those lazy worker's fault that there are no jobs librechik Apr 2013 #18

K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #19

the private sector is doing fine. quadrature Apr 2013 #20

You're kidding Right? Munificence Apr 2013 #21

The private sector is doing fine? OhioChick Apr 2013 #22