Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

DallasNE

(8,019 posts)

11. Thanks

Reply to DhhD (Reply #9)

Sun Apr 7, 2013, 11:14 PM

Apr 2013

Wrong department but the same question. When was that manual last updated and does it include bitumen oil? While there would be overlap there are things that are unique as well. Just look at the outcome from that spill in Michigan -- still issues with the clean up effort after 2 years.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Activists Claim Arkansas Oil Spill Diverted Into Wet Lands... [View all] busterbrown Apr 2013 OP

K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #1

I believe you mean the Freedom to Love America Clean Waterways Act. nt limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #3

Yes well.... DeSwiss Apr 2013 #5

Ark. Attorney General: "Of course there is oil in Lake Conway" limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #2

Diverting it to wetlands is no better. Horrible! glinda Apr 2013 #4

Diverting it to the wetlands is worse. summerschild Apr 2013 #13

exactly glinda Apr 2013 #15

Where Has The EPA Been On This? DallasNE Apr 2013 #6

Oil Spills are handled through the US Department of the Interior by way of the Minerals Management DhhD Apr 2013 #9

Thanks DallasNE Apr 2013 #11

No, probably not. The EPA has jurisdiction over wetlands if the lands in question meet the new byeya Apr 2013 #14

I put this together ashling Apr 2013 #7

People need to learn to keep criminals like Exxon, BP, Halliburton, etc. out of their communities Renew Deal Apr 2013 #8

Where is Holder on this bahrbearian Apr 2013 #10

"claim?" Evidence looks pretty concrete ffr Apr 2013 #12