Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
3. When auto-pilot and auto-hover are factored in,
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 01:25 AM
Apr 2013

Physical input becomes less of a factor.

*However* Even if this pilot had those controls, there's no disputing the "pilot error" conclusion for this tragedy.

What wasn't mentioned was the pilots reaction to the "low fuel" annunciator. It is impossible to miss. And it seems unlikely that the pilot would ignore it- if only in terms of self preservation. He/she's got time to set it down if he/she actually run's the thing out of fuel. And if the pilot is competent with autorotation, a controlled touchdown should be even more probable.

Damn shame.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NTSB: Pilot's texting con...»Reply #3