Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That man should spend only one or two nights in jail. Loudly Apr 2013 #1
So? The Second Amendment says that's ok. onehandle Apr 2013 #2
Just an honest man trying to make a living! Obama the job killer! freshwest Apr 2013 #4
Obama's socialist, jackbooted gun confiscation has begun with drones and child indoctrination camps! freshwest Apr 2013 #3
Just heard what Washington is doing... Mr.Pain Apr 2013 #5
Well, grenades haven't been generally available to the public since at least 1934 AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #6
I'm sure the guy in Lincoln thinks the same way. sinkingfeeling Apr 2013 #13
No wonder the stores have no ammo golfguru Apr 2013 #7
That fucking asshole has blood on his hands. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #8
what`s the problem? madrchsod Apr 2013 #9
Are you being sarcastic or serious? Paladin Apr 2013 #10
This is one of the NRA poster boys........ Historic NY Apr 2013 #11
He does not meet the legal definition of a private seller hack89 Apr 2013 #12
He can just say he bought those guns to fulfill his home defense needs. IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #19
It was not the number of guns. It was what he was doing with them. hack89 Apr 2013 #22
His claim was that the guns were his own, and he was therefore free to sell them. IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #24
Criminals will always say something other than "I am guilty". hack89 Apr 2013 #27
The same claim can be made of prescription pain meds NickB79 Apr 2013 #29
Well, maybe he needed them. After all, guns make the world a better, happy, wonderful place. valerief Apr 2013 #14
Or maybe he is simply a criminal running a criminal enterprise? nt hack89 Apr 2013 #15
We're not allowed to think of the obvious here in the great U.S. of A. nt valerief Apr 2013 #16
I had no problem doing it. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #17
That's because, like all the popgun enthusiasts here, IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #20
I look at what he was doing with his guns and say "He's obviously a criminal" hack89 Apr 2013 #23
I guess my point is that he could claim to need all those guns for personal defense purposes IveWornAHundredPants Apr 2013 #25
Except the law is very explicit on what constitutes illegal gun dealing hack89 Apr 2013 #28
From another article on the story: Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #18
How do you know he avoided background checks? hack89 Apr 2013 #30
Wouldn't really change my point. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #31
Certainly agree that the background check system needs to be strengthened. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #32
So-called law abiders are the ultimate source for illegal gun sales jpak Apr 2013 #21
Well, that's reasonable. bowens43 Apr 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Agents found 678 guns,13 ...»Reply #26