Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
32. When we break the GOP - NRA stranglehold on nominations:
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 09:34 PM
Apr 2013
On the ATF Director, or the conspicuous lack of same

Jan 13, 2013 by The Tytalan Way

The Melissa Harris-Perry show this morning tackled a variety of gun control issues, and in the process I was reminded of one in particular that hasn't come up lately -- to the point that people around me aren't even aware of it.

Back in 2006, Congress added a requirement for Senate confirmation of any new director for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives; and even since then, there has been no actual director of the ATF. Since that time it has been led by acting directors, including right now.

And so a government bureau with a budget of over a billion dollars continues to be led by an acting director due to stonewalling in the Senate by Republicans, at the behest of the NRA.

The agency is led by B. Todd Jones, Acting Director,[4] and Thomas E. Brandon, Deputy Director.[5] ATF has nearly 5,000 employees and an annual budget of $1.12 billion (2010).[2]

Republicans during the Bush regime. In particular, it is apparently the work of James Sensenbrenner, House rep. from Wisconsin. The results were predictable, as described in this ThinkProgress article from 2011.

Shortly after the 2006 law took effect, President Bush nominated U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan to head the ATF, but even a Republican president’s choice proved unacceptable to pro-gun lobbyists. The NRA, in particular, accused Sullivan of “overly restrictive legal interpretations” and “overly zealous enforcement activities” because, while Sullivan served as Acting Director of ATF, the agency revoked several gun dealers licenses to sell firearms. Sens. David Vitter (R-LA), Larry Craig (R-ID) and Mike Crapo (R-ID) quickly took up the gun lobby’s cause, placing a hold on Sullivan’s nomination until he agreed to comply with the NRA’s demands. Sullivan was never confirmed.

The problem only got worse once President Obama took office. Obama did not nominate an ATF Director until Nov. 2010, in no small part because the administration “had a tough time even finding a candidate interested in the ATF job because of likely gun-lobby resistance.” When Obama finally did nominate Andrew Traver, a 23 year veteran of the ATF and the head of its Chicago office, the gun lobby did not disappoint. Within 24 hours of the Traver nomination, the NRA officially announced its opposition.

The NRA's press release objecting to Andrew Traver has been archived on the wayback machine. The NRA accuses Traver of lining up behind gun control "advocates" and "schemes".

The IACP report, generated with Traver's help, called on Congress to ban thousands of commonly owned firearms by misrepresenting them as “assault weapons,” as well as calling for bans on .50 caliber rifles and widely used types of ammunition. The report also suggests that Congress should regulate gun shows out of existence and should repeal the privacy protections of the Tiahrt Amendment -- all efforts strongly opposed by the NRA and its members.

Interesting, this; after all, a renewed assault weapons ban has come up in discussions now and it's going to come up in Congress, at least. And repealing the Tiahrt amendment is on the list of proposals put out by MAIG, Mayors Against Illegal Guns.

Tiahrt is the author of the Tiahrt Amendment, which prohibits the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) from releasing information from its firearms trace database to anyone other than a law enforcement agency or prosecutor in connection with a criminal investigation. Additionally, any data so released is inadmissible in a civil lawsuit.[5] Some groups, including the Mayors Against Illegal Guns Coalition, believe that having further access to the ATF database would help municipal police departments track down sellers of illegal guns and curb crime. These groups are trying to undo the Tiahrt Amendment.[6] Numerous police organizations oppose the Tiahrt Amendment, such as the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) and the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP).[7] Conversely, the Tiahrt Amendment is supported by the Fraternal Order of Police, although it allows municipal police departments limited access to ATF trace data in any criminal investigation.

Besides protecting against civil suits, it hampers actual criminal investigation as well. But since it hides data about guns and gun violence, the NRA (and supposedly its membership) is for it. And Republicans in the House and Senate engineered this 'solution,' which depends on the broken system in the Senate that allows for nearly unlimited Senate obstructionism on the part of the GOP.

This has been the state of affairs since 2006, when Sensenbrenner slipped a provision into the PATRIOT Act re-authorization. Perhaps things have changed enough since then, though. The influence and approval of the NRA is on the wane, and ideas like banning assault weapons and repealing the Tiahrt amendment are now back 'on the table,' in spite of NRA protests. It may be time for a new director to be nominated for the ATF as well. Or at least, it seems time to remind the people of what Republicans did for the NRA to make the ATF as toothless as possible against curbing gun violence. And Democrats in the Senate are poised to make changes, to make it more functional; this can be added to the list of reasons why.

Many things came together to make this possible. Odd little bits of legislation, slipped into larger bills. Republican dominance during the Bush regime. The broken Senate. And most of all, the NRA running the show.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/gun-control-proposal-from-biden-needs-long-overdue-atf-leadership-to-succeed/2013/01/13/f78a4ffc-5dcc-11e2-90a0-73c8343c6d61_story.html

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/13/1178634/-On-the-ATF-Director-or-the-conspicuous-lack-of-same

The Daily Kos allows printing articles in their entirety.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I smell an anti Obama conspiracy in the works. Mika Apr 2013 #1
Why? I think it's just tragic; buying guns off the internet is babylonsister Apr 2013 #3
Right. He's comin tuh git yer guns. Mika Apr 2013 #7
Yes, but an overwhelming majority babylonsister Apr 2013 #8
I agree w/you. Mika Apr 2013 #15
When most people think of Jenoch Apr 2013 #9
What? I buy stuff off the internet all the time, babylonsister Apr 2013 #11
I missed a word. Jenoch Apr 2013 #13
I didn't know that. So babylonsister Apr 2013 #26
So that did not happen with Holmes? This story says otherwise: freshwest Apr 2013 #28
He bought ammo and equipment online, not guns. Travis_0004 Apr 2013 #30
That M1 was not from "some guy on the internets" JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2013 #55
Perhaps you missed it, but a gun is not a helmet. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #44
The gun gets shipped to a Dealer who fills out the paperwork formercia Apr 2013 #16
Yep Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #20
About that background check... babylonsister Apr 2013 #27
Standard NICS checck Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #36
Every FFL Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #37
Because most people don't understand the laws already on the books. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #45
Every federal dealer is required to run the purchaser through the federal NICS system. krispos42 Apr 2013 #61
That transaction was already illegal, per multiple laws. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #42
Wouldn't it be MORE anti-Obama if he'd said it was a REGISTERED gun? n/t. Ken Burch Apr 2013 #10
Obviously, the removed serial # has Obama's hands all over it. Mika Apr 2013 #17
So he illegally purchased an illegal firearm. Just how many more laws would have prevented this? Leslie Valley Apr 2013 #2
Are you suggesting doing so is easy? elleng Apr 2013 #5
Who said the laws aren't being enforced? Renew Deal Apr 2013 #52
but how easy was it to do so booley Apr 2013 #58
Premeditated? CincyDem Apr 2013 #4
broke many existing laws Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #6
Restricting sales on the internet will prevent this, the ISPs can an do, shut things down. freshwest Apr 2013 #12
same as a newpaper classified Duckhunter935 Apr 2013 #22
You didn't address anything I said, you're defecting again. I won't play that game. Bye. freshwest Apr 2013 #23
I don't follow your reasoning freshwest. The trasnsfer was completely illegal under existing law. slackmaster Apr 2013 #25
I think its obvious that a guy selling a gun without a serial number doesn't care about the law Travis_0004 Apr 2013 #31
Those doing transactions online can be caught and prosecuted. Criminals are used to that. freshwest Apr 2013 #33
Then they will catch the guy who sold it to him. WinniSkipper Apr 2013 #59
FWIW naaman fletcher Apr 2013 #38
I don't think you understand. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #46
We don't know how he got the gun krispos42 Apr 2013 #62
The NRA is blocking a ban on internet sales. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #19
He won't answer, see my replles and his above. n/t freshwest Apr 2013 #24
I think the story is bullshit naaman fletcher Apr 2013 #39
It's too easy to circumvent the law via internet sales; the ATF doesn't have enough resources. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #40
Internet sales are a whole lot easier to track than face-to-face transactions at random locations slackmaster Apr 2013 #41
It is hard to find buyers for those kind of sales without internet ads. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #43
Except of course the USDoJ already measures this and the internet is not a major source AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #47
Then why do the gun mfrs have their panties in a bunch over the thought of banning internet sales? SunSeeker Apr 2013 #49
Because the sales you are referring to take place not between private parties, but between dealers, AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #50
Holmes built his arsenal of bullets, ballistic gear through an unregulated online market. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #51
I agree on the ATF. I wish to increase their budget and confirm director, etc. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #53
So now you want to ban internet sales of WinniSkipper Apr 2013 #60
So someone should be able to buy 10,000 bullets over the internet no questions asked? nt SunSeeker Apr 2013 #63
Was that what I asked? WinniSkipper Apr 2013 #64
I wonder how drug dealers manage to make sales without posting ads on the Internet slackmaster Apr 2013 #56
It's not easy. They get busted all the time; look at our jails. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #57
More gunz will solve this right? DainBramaged Apr 2013 #29
I hope they are able to trace the seller and prosecute to the full extent of the law. bluedigger Apr 2013 #14
When we break the GOP - NRA stranglehold on nominations: freshwest Apr 2013 #32
Thanks for posting this! bluedigger Apr 2013 #34
It'll make no difference there. This has turned into a Gungeon free for all. Bye. freshwest Apr 2013 #35
A new director would be a good thing. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #48
Maybe now we can stop this shit? jpak Apr 2013 #18
If only he'd had a dozen more unregistered guns, this never would have happened, because valerief Apr 2013 #21
I think we can ALL agree that Rick Warren's a weirdo lanlady Apr 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rick Warren: Son Used Unr...»Reply #32