Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Xipe Totec

(44,589 posts)

7. There is something inately perverse in asking the undocumented for documented evidence

Reply to Paul E Ester (Original post)

Sun Apr 14, 2013, 01:37 AM

Apr 2013

That they have been here all along.

The very nature of their life in the United States is to leave no trace; to be invisible.

Now in order to remain here they must produce documented proof that they have been here all along.

That's a very tall order given the circumstances.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate plan would deport illegal immigrants entering U.S. after 2011 [View all] Paul E Ester Apr 2013 OP

Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #1

Whose culture would that be? arcane1 Apr 2013 #2

We need to recognize why people are willing to risk emigrating illegally Babel_17 Apr 2013 #3

This needs press or there will be a last minute flood of people tyrying to take advantage Coyotl Apr 2013 #4

I notice Reuters are effectively saying AP's PC unit can go screw themselves dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #5

I think the controversy was more about the term "illegals" than "illegal immigrants." nomorenomore08 Apr 2013 #9

See here dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #11

Okay. I actually did read that, or a similar article, previously. nomorenomore08 Apr 2013 #12

One of the better compromises to come out of this Congress. nt DemocraticProse Apr 2013 #6

There is something inately perverse in asking the undocumented for documented evidence Xipe Totec Apr 2013 #7

The whole thing does seem needlessly convoluted, if not downright hypocritical. nomorenomore08 Apr 2013 #10

When this was done in the past WilmywoodNCparalegal Apr 2013 #14

I agree there has to be a cut off date, but the end of the year last year would be fair davidpdx Apr 2013 #8

Repeat Macoy51 Apr 2013 #13

True davidpdx Apr 2013 #15