Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

John2

(2,730 posts)
22. I'm going to give you a straight forward answer.
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 05:40 AM
Apr 2013

The answer is a resounding Yes! And I assure you, I have a complete grasp of the Wars in Iraq. There is clear information Israel wanted the U.S. to attack Iraq and now Iran. The notion Israel can defeat iran by themselves is ludicrous. The dominant interest, the U.S. has in the Middle East is protecting the state of Israel at any cost. That has been stated on a number of occasions. The premise, is not to let any of her adversaries to gain military equivalence.

The United States arms Israel. That is the only means a state with a very small population gained such military superiority. They even turned a blind eye to Israel getting nuclear weapons and introducing those weapons first into the Middle East. Why else do you think the U.S. don't want another state to have military equivalence in that region? You actually feel right wing politicians in this country care about human rights of Arabs? I think you do know the answers to those questions and there is some point you are trying to lead too. I'm trying to flush you out more than you are trying to flush me out. That is because I think you already know my point.

I have already stated numerous times on this forum, that I think U.S. Foreign Policy is racist and bias at best. On one hand, they allow a state to introduce or carry on a nuclear weapons programs in the Middle East without a peep or objection. So are you going to lead us to believe the U.S. intelligence agency has no knowledge of this, but knows every thing about Iraq, North Korea or Iran? At the same time they accuse states of arming terrorists, in conflict with Israel, while at the same time providing arms to Israel. Lets not play games now, My point is obviously clear. Your point needs to be made more clearer, not mine. And I'm more independent than probably you are, because I'm not Jewish or Arab. I'm not very religious either. I'm just a native born U.S. citizen that object to it all. You think I'm a traitor now?



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That appears to be a usurption of executive power by the Senate... Agnosticsherbet Apr 2013 #1
Congress handed the Bush administration authority to start a war with Iraq GitRDun Apr 2013 #2
Well that's nice. DeSwiss Apr 2013 #3
Psychopaths drdtroit Apr 2013 #4
So if Israel wants us to bomb Iran, we're going to? LeftInTX Apr 2013 #5
If that were true we would have gone in four years ago. ucrdem Apr 2013 #9
Thx :) LeftInTX Apr 2013 #12
Just Great! Get involved in another war with borrowed money from China golfguru Apr 2013 #6
There is not going to be a war. It is not in anyone's, including Israel's interest no matter what still_one Apr 2013 #7
Sometimes, I just grow weary of the BS and think that something mbperrin Apr 2013 #8
Please not another Afghanistan... sakabatou Apr 2013 #10
Might as well sneak this in while everyone is distracted. bobduca Apr 2013 #11
Other than alternative news sites, I'm not seeing much being said about this davidpdx Apr 2013 #13
Exactly Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2013 #29
Where did that "fuck this shit" video go? Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #14
This is a clear example, John2 Apr 2013 #15
what war? You say cali Apr 2013 #16
That is the point of this John2 Apr 2013 #17
You didn't answer cali's question. She asked...What war? Behind the Aegis Apr 2013 #18
The Wars in Iraq, and John2 Apr 2013 #19
So you believe the wars in Iraq were fought at the behest of Israel? Behind the Aegis Apr 2013 #20
I'm going to give you a straight forward answer. John2 Apr 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Behind the Aegis Apr 2013 #23
No, you don't have a "complete grasp" of the wars in Iraq. Behind the Aegis Apr 2013 #26
You have to be much more John2 Apr 2013 #27
Okay, that wrong and nutty. cali Apr 2013 #31
OK. First of all it doesn't give Israel anything. It's a non-binding resolution cali Apr 2013 #28
Israel and the US sound just like North Korea aandegoons Apr 2013 #21
the U.S. Senate would back Israel if they attacked Disney World - get real Douglas Carpenter Apr 2013 #24
Let's face it. DC wants to thrust the US into a Holy War against Islam. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #25
Did Isreal get one of those envelopes that says "YOU'RE PREAPPROVED!" ? KurtNYC Apr 2013 #30
I'm shocked! Doctor_J Apr 2013 #32
Hold your horses people MrBig Apr 2013 #33
If it means nothing, why did they bother with the resolution? daleo Apr 2013 #40
Just think ...how much more war we can have by diminishing SS payments. L0oniX Apr 2013 #34
That's just awesome. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2013 #35
''Anyone can go to Baghdad. Real men go to Tehran.'' Octafish Apr 2013 #36
Just posturing? proverbialwisdom Apr 2013 #37
Charter a plane and take them all over there. Fearless Apr 2013 #38
Does "actualize its right to self defense" mean preemptive strikes? /nt Ash_F Apr 2013 #39
That's what I got from it daleo Apr 2013 #41
"in case it is compelled to take military action" ronnie624 Apr 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Senate: Will back Isra...»Reply #22