Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Begich Explains Background Check ‘No’ Vote: We Shouldn’t Legislate With Our Emotions [View all]earthside
(6,960 posts)29. What would Begich have done on December 8, 1941?
Would he have voted 'no' to declare war on Japan since Americans were "all worked up" over the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
Sorry, I like Begich, but he is lying about his reasons for voting 'no' on the background checks amendment.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Begich Explains Background Check ‘No’ Vote: We Shouldn’t Legislate With Our Emotions [View all]
DonViejo
Apr 2013
OP
Can't allow compassion to get in the way of his fundraising. After all, there's power to be had.
Dollface
Apr 2013
#38
No, *you* legislate with your big open pocketbook and your miniscule tackle
MotherPetrie
Apr 2013
#6