Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yeah fuck the constitution!!11!!! Kali Apr 2013 #1
Did Dzhokhar and Tamerlane Tsarnaev care about the Constitutional rights.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #5
does any criminal? Kali Apr 2013 #9
We ARE BETTER THAN THEM! LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #14
Good God vrp Apr 2013 #25
Thank you. defacto7 Apr 2013 #55
Agreed Sherman A1 Apr 2013 #70
Agreed! nt avebury Apr 2013 #80
Yes, God is good LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #86
Are you for fucking real? premium Apr 2013 #94
Groupthink, I see/read... LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #103
You need a civics class! vrp Apr 2013 #101
So, again.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #102
What about me? vrp Apr 2013 #105
President Obama's LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #107
Naturalized citizens have every right natural-born Americans have Daniel537 Apr 2013 #121
Nope, sorry. Thanks for playing. eggplant Apr 2013 #27
He's a muslim. Arrowhead2k1 Apr 2013 #42
No "Game Playing" required or necessary, instead LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #89
Why do you hate America and out Constitution? kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #47
So since the President of the United States LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #90
Inquiring minds want to know why you're here premium Apr 2013 #95
Because... LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #106
And some of us are in an awful hurry to stop being better. n/t Orsino Apr 2013 #73
did you say the same John2 Apr 2013 #76
If you don't make Constitutional Rights and Miranda avebury Apr 2013 #78
In this case I agree with you. I cried over that little boy....crying right now. n/t SylviaD Apr 2013 #122
The constitution defines how the GOVERNMENT is supposed to behave adieu Apr 2013 #21
Perfect. Nicely put. Ed Suspicious Apr 2013 #65
People like you really scare me! Wind Dancer Apr 2013 #48
If you apply your theory, there would never be any Miranda rights, JDPriestly Apr 2013 #49
Exactly.... Well said.... midnight Apr 2013 #100
I was waiting for the punchline... but you seem to be serious cthulu2016 Apr 2013 #50
With your logic Bush/Cheney should be shot bjobotts Apr 2013 #59
Welcome to DU. n/t Orsino Apr 2013 #74
So we beome just like them? atreides1 Apr 2013 #82
He is a citizen just like you curlyred Apr 2013 #93
Yes, the Constitution should only apply to shoplifters Hugabear Apr 2013 #120
Fuckin' A! Miranda rights are only for good guys! RufusTFirefly Apr 2013 #16
as long as we are SAFE! safe, watching the tee vee Kali Apr 2013 #19
I feel a wave of patriotism coming over me. Guess I'd better go out and shop! RufusTFirefly Apr 2013 #24
let's not forget it's just a "damn piece of paper" Mira Apr 2013 #20
Yeah, fuck the Constitutiion! As W said it's just a piece of paper. And, thank Jeebus, our wonderful kath Apr 2013 #22
Mob rule huh. Just hang 'em.Graham gooberism. bjobotts Apr 2013 #62
Any statement made would not be used in a trial. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #26
Completely unnecessary. And the information gained would not save lives. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #52
And you know this how, exactly? Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #83
Thank you! LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #88
The Supreme Court has said statements made can be used at trial. former9thward Apr 2013 #97
Do you understand the Miranda rule? geek tragedy Apr 2013 #40
It is unnecessary. It will not be difficult to get this young man to talk. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #53
I understand the thinking ... brett_jv Apr 2013 #2
Not if the NDAA has anything to say about it..... midnight Apr 2013 #3
Not unconstitutional at all. The only prohibition is using what was said during custodial 24601 Apr 2013 #4
They're invoking a SCOTUS "public safety exception" to DirkGently Apr 2013 #8
The "Public Safety Exception" is broad, but it still has its limitations happyslug Apr 2013 #18
It appears to be part of this administration's terror policy. DirkGently Apr 2013 #30
Makes sense. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #58
Propably why the official described the public safety exception and then said, "...and to try 24601 Apr 2013 #75
Exactly LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #108
Does he have the right to deny post-Miranda what he said pre-Miranda? JDPriestly Apr 2013 #56
You are asking TWO questions, use of pre Miranda to impeachment a Witness AND use for other purposes happyslug Apr 2013 #87
Miranda Rights only kick in if you want to question the suspect. happyslug Apr 2013 #6
You are generally correct jberryhill Apr 2013 #7
Would be helpful to know if they were coached in their bomb-making and event planning... JudyM Apr 2013 #13
That does NOT come under the Public Safety Exception to the Miranda Rule happyslug Apr 2013 #23
In the interest of neutralizing any imminent threats from others in their group, if there is a group JudyM Apr 2013 #123
It's remarkable how few people understand that kudzu22 Apr 2013 #43
Good points. They do not need to set aside his Miranda rights. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #60
Thank you George W. Bush and Dick Cheney BanTheGOP Apr 2013 #10
And Barak Hussein Obama for walking down the same path. It is his fucking call... Purveyor Apr 2013 #29
All Miranda rule means is that they can't use what he says against geek tragedy Apr 2013 #41
Thank you! LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #109
It Also Means RobinA Apr 2013 #117
miranda rights just get in the way of justice dmrtndl1 Apr 2013 #11
Look to the Hague.Last administration's home. bjobotts Apr 2013 #64
So his confession will be inadmissable... bhikkhu Apr 2013 #12
I think you will find extreme exigent circumstances here allowing questioning around other possible RBInMaine Apr 2013 #15
I have a tough time with this but - I still need to think about this one jg15 Apr 2013 #31
But why risk it. It takes less time to recite DeadEyeDyck Apr 2013 #91
I think the reasoning of the Public Safety Exception bhikkhu Apr 2013 #92
It Does Seem RobinA Apr 2013 #118
I Don't Understand these Ridiculous Decisions! mckara Apr 2013 #17
Lindsey Graham vrp Apr 2013 #28
Well look on the bright side! BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #112
It's been constitutional since 1980: Public Safety Exemption (New York v. Quarles) frazzled Apr 2013 #32
So basically they need some time to torture him........Obama is no better than bush on civil rights bowens43 Apr 2013 #35
If that does indeed happen (which I don't think it will), and THEN he gets to have his day in court? Volaris Apr 2013 #51
Good lord frazzled Apr 2013 #72
Flame bait ... eom Kolesar Apr 2013 #81
if the feds have enough evidence to convict without a confession rollin74 Apr 2013 #33
It isn't about that--it's about getting him to talk about where he got his bomb making help. MADem Apr 2013 #68
Obama Bush...... meet the new boss, same as the old boss bowens43 Apr 2013 #34
Really? LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #110
It Strikes Me RobinA Apr 2013 #119
. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #36
Ugh. We are supposed to be better than this... AzDar Apr 2013 #37
Due process is supposed to be guaranteed for every citizen. Mr.Pain Apr 2013 #38
I have to remind folks Adam-Bomb Apr 2013 #39
The one in custody became a citizen kudzu22 Apr 2013 #44
That can be revoked though. cstanleytech Apr 2013 #46
Yes they are--the kid got citizenship on 911, ironically. Or not. MADem Apr 2013 #67
Good point LovingA2andMI Apr 2013 #111
"this will backfire" Maybe, maybe not. cstanleytech Apr 2013 #45
I stand with the administration to make the decisions necessary for public safety. MOTRDemocrat Apr 2013 #54
Creepy lockstep loyalty plus gutter-level guilt by association RufusTFirefly Apr 2013 #61
And I got $50 that says that if the opposite had happened ... brett_jv Apr 2013 #98
Yep that's the Department of InJustice for ya..... DeSwiss Apr 2013 #57
He gets full rights or this isn't the USA. nt delrem Apr 2013 #63
Was this guy even coherent enough to be questioned ? steve2470 Apr 2013 #66
Martial Law and this... down the rabbit hole we go jakeXT Apr 2013 #69
While I think the suspect... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #113
Read him is rights. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #71
You are joking right? John2 Apr 2013 #79
Actually, that is a valid point. Even after being Mirandized, Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #84
Obviously, you don't understand. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #116
What's the big deal? secondvariety Apr 2013 #77
Read him his rights walkerbait41 Apr 2013 #85
sure soon they will read him his rights. republicans may call for him only in the Fed system. Sunlei Apr 2013 #96
It's amazing he's still alive. Nika Apr 2013 #99
It is amazing he is alive. Twice, a hail of police bullets. Sunlei Apr 2013 #104
Rachael Maddow Explains Why Dzhokar Tsarnaev was not read his Miranda rights.. Cha Apr 2013 #114
Every single day, our rights being dismantled woo me with science Apr 2013 #115
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»No Miranda rights for now...»Reply #17