Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
29. Possible, I guess.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 11:14 PM
Apr 2013

Bachmann reminds me very much of Dick Armey, an opponent so deeply stupid, self-absorbed, privileged and incompetent that the Democrats want to keep her around more than Republicans do.

It's easier for Republicans to do such a thing to one another, too, because they protect each other from criminal disclosures about themselves, rather than police themselves.

Thus dirt is always available when one Republican wishes to damage a rival Republican.

I disagree about Tom DeLay, though. What we know he actually did, what he could have been prosecuted for, what he actually was prosecuted for, the cushy trial delays, and the eventual hand-slap sentence he got (which he has still yet to serve while he continues to appeal) all point to his fellow Republicans protecting Tom DeLay (and the rest of the GOP) from many more, much larger criminal disclosures.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She'll plead not guilty by reason of mental defect....... marmar Apr 2013 #1
Well as an expert witness I can confirm that it is true. grantcart Apr 2013 #8
Well, I happen to know from a reliable source, that her specific diagnosis is rateyes Apr 2013 #26
So the affidavit proves she knew about the unethical payments ... 66 dmhlt Apr 2013 #35
But what about Politicalboi Apr 2013 #2
She's got a new conspiracy to play with... DonViejo Apr 2013 #3
Has she jumped on that bandwagon? Brother Buzz Apr 2013 #7
Not yet, that I know of, but I expect it any minute now. nt DonViejo Apr 2013 #14
I don't see what the big deal is. Baitball Blogger Apr 2013 #13
I'll tell you about Benghazi jmowreader Apr 2013 #32
Republican. Family. Values. Grins Apr 2013 #4
Someone smarter than she said "yes," too. sofa king Apr 2013 #5
It certainly looks to me that most of these Republicans are above the law. lexw Apr 2013 #17
Or beneath/below it. merrily Apr 2013 #33
Hmmm, Is Rove Paying Parrish to Come Clean to Get Rid of Crazy Bachmann? dballance Apr 2013 #6
It's possible someone is greasing someone else's palm... DonViejo Apr 2013 #9
Possible, I guess. sofa king Apr 2013 #29
But DeLay is out of office... DonViejo Apr 2013 #30
That he is. sofa king Apr 2013 #31
Maybe Marcus watoos Apr 2013 #10
+1000 TeamPooka Apr 2013 #21
Why is anyone bothering with this investigation. What a joke. She's a REPUBLICAN. She will NEVER be kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #11
Can she be censured? Or made to just STFY and go away? Myrina Apr 2013 #12
The Tower Dwellers that Rove represents watoos Apr 2013 #15
Looked at by the "Ethics Committee"? bvar22 Apr 2013 #16
"Gawd" prolly told her it was okay to lie, cheat or steal... Hubert Flottz Apr 2013 #18
BENGHAZI!!!!! MinneapolisMatt Apr 2013 #19
approving "hidden" payments? UpInArms Apr 2013 #20
Talk about your arm's length transactions OldHippieChick Apr 2013 #22
"We relied on his representations in this regard.” Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #23
sure it's perfectly legal to funnel 7500 a month to me, trust m. - this is like trusting some drunk leftyohiolib Apr 2013 #24
What gets me is everyone KNOWS Republicans are a pack of liars... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #25
GOP = greedy old pricks. Initech Apr 2013 #27
I have a hard time believing that, she, a tax lawyer for the IRS... MoonchildCA Apr 2013 #28
Savvy. blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #34
Laws are for Hubert Flottz Apr 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Affidavit says Bachmann a...»Reply #29