Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,012 posts)
11. My first thought as well
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 10:42 AM
Apr 2013

Could it really be that he believes the bill would not help? That and his negative comments on the ACA - that he as mush as anyone - designed really suggest that something is going on with him. It would seem that, if he wanted to retire, he could do it on a high note. If there is anything that will be his legacy it is the ACA. He was a key player in crafting something that could get all 60 votes needed. He could work on making sure he does as much as possible to help - not hurt it - and you would thing all his votes could be based only on the good of the whole country.

I have defended him as someone who when it came down to it was able to do some good things. One example, is that in fall 2010 the jobs bill that was passed when 2 Republicans (both retiring) signed on. Baucus' role? He and John Kerry wrote the amendment that closed some foreign tax dodges - and that provided the revenue to balance the costs of the various measures that stimulated or produced jobs. Without the bill being revenue neutral, it would have failed. In addition, as conservative as he has been, he has fought against cuts to social security - including trying to pass an amendment that would have required 60 votes to change anything on social security to a bill that would have given an "up or down" vote to any recommendations of the Simpson/Bowles task force. (The bill failed and S/B never got any recommendations voted out by the committee. )

I wonder if Schweitzer will run. It may be he is better positioned as Governor. (Is he term limited?) At any rate, he. like Tester, would likely quickly lose their status as a DU favorite if he ran and won. If not, this makes it harder for us to keep the Senate. Baucus - independent of any personal characteristics - offers Montana undue power as the chair of the Finance committee.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Couldn't vote for background checks, but not even running for re-election-- TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #1
My first thought as well karynnj Apr 2013 #11
I hope Schweitzer does run--if there's any way to keep that seat, that's probably TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #46
Or maybe he's not willing to face the music after that vote. apnu Apr 2013 #22
At least he stands up for what he believes in Ter Apr 2013 #30
This is a pleasant surprise BumRushDaShow Apr 2013 #2
Schweitzer's views are similar to Howard Deans in 2003-4 Larkspur Apr 2013 #17
What a thoughtful analysis! Lasher Apr 2013 #24
Brian is not conservative. He's much more center-left. Liberal_Stalwart71 Apr 2013 #31
Why did he vote against background checks if he wasn't going to run again anyway? BlueStater Apr 2013 #3
Because he's a $$$$$ whore. nt valerief Apr 2013 #5
He'll be a rich NRA lobbiest now. Kablooie Apr 2013 #15
Heaven the thought, but maybe he's a politician that really believes in something Ter Apr 2013 #32
Apparently, he believes 20 dead children weren't enough. N/T BlueStater Apr 2013 #39
He believed in laughing as Single Payer advocates were arrested and dragged FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #43
Well, he'll be sitting on a fat pension on top of all the lobbyist money he's gotten. valerief Apr 2013 #4
I really hope that Schweitzer runs Jbradshaw120 Apr 2013 #6
This IS great news.....now, to keep the seat. a kennedy Apr 2013 #7
Once again . . . HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #8
I remember laughing the day that came out. sofa king Apr 2013 #18
Baucus certainly is no liberal, but i wish he was running Hawaii Hiker Apr 2013 #9
Jon Tester won his seat back, as did my good friend Steve Bullock who is now the governor. Liberal_Stalwart71 Apr 2013 #33
Why did he vote against EC Apr 2013 #10
Must have been my email to him montanacowboy Apr 2013 #12
Whenever I hear his name, PatSeg Apr 2013 #36
Now mtasselin Apr 2013 #13
You are wrong Coyotl Apr 2013 #19
Exactly what I've been saying. premium Apr 2013 #26
Then how do you explain montanacowboy Apr 2013 #27
Simple Coyotl Apr 2013 #29
I'll bet there is a position for him PatSeg Apr 2013 #38
We'll know why he voted against background checks when we see what lobbying job he gets. nt SunSeeker Apr 2013 #14
Scweitzer is taking a job as CEO sorefeet Apr 2013 #16
JUst a nineteen50 Apr 2013 #20
What a tool. His mug wont be missed. ErikJ Apr 2013 #21
What "powerful committee"? xtraxritical Apr 2013 #23
"Some of us don't have time to follow every link and read every article" Capt. Obvious Apr 2013 #25
What do ya mean excerpt? I see nothing about the "committee" in the post. xtraxritical Apr 2013 #41
Here, I bolded it for you Capt. Obvious Apr 2013 #44
lol Enrique Apr 2013 #45
Well duh, ok, I'm senile. Thanks! xtraxritical Apr 2013 #49
Good bye you asshole!! Everyone seems to blame Obama for the lack of public option, siding with bank Liberal_Stalwart71 Apr 2013 #28
Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya! grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #34
*dancing* Cleita Apr 2013 #35
Good riddance! lark Apr 2013 #37
Buh-Bye DINO! SoapBox Apr 2013 #40
Well, it was nice having Montana in the Dem column for a while NickB79 Apr 2013 #42
+1 davidpdx Apr 2013 #47
I nominate Max for the Joe Lieberman Prize. Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #48
He probably will go lobby with the rest of his former staffers at a mega insurance agency.... midnight Apr 2013 #50
Yay! patrice Apr 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Baucus to retire rather t...»Reply #11