Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

G_j

(40,562 posts)
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 04:50 PM Apr 2013

Tar Sands Pipelines Should Get Special Treatment, EPA Says [View all]

Last edited Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:40 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: NPR

Tar Sands Pipelines Should Get Special Treatment, EPA Says
by ELIZABETH SHOGREN
April 24, 2013 3:21 PM



Up until now, pipelines that carry tar sands oil have been treated just like pipelines that carry any other oil. But the Environmental Protection Agency now says that should change. That's because when tar sands oil spills, it can be next to impossible to clean up.

The agency made this argument in its evaluation of the State Department's environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline project which, if approved, would carry heavy crude from Alberta, Canada, to refineries in the United States.

The EPA's letter urges the State Department to set special standards to prevent Keystone from spilling, and make sure any spills that happen are rapidly contained.

The EPA says it has learned about the additional risks of tar sands spills from a cleanup of a 2010 tar sands spill into Michigan's Kalamazoo River that has dragged out nearly three years and cost more than $1 billion. A lot of the heavy crude sank to the bottom and hasn't biodegraded.

Read more: http://www.npr.org/2013/04/24/178844620/tar-sands-pipelines-should-get-special-treatment-epa-says



Even rocks that have been contaminated must be disposed of....
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's a mistake to call what they carry "heavy crude" dpbrown Apr 2013 #1
I never saw the stuff watoos Apr 2013 #2
Simple logic should tell one that.... ReRe Apr 2013 #19
No doubt corrosive chemical reactions are also happening inside the pipe daleo Apr 2013 #41
It's not only corrosive from the toxins added to make it flow arikara Apr 2013 #42
Here's a description from an oil sands scientist daleo Apr 2013 #43
They heat it and mix it with diluting chemicals daleo Apr 2013 #22
Yep, lots of chemicals laundry_queen May 2013 #44
I wonder why GitRDun Apr 2013 #3
Exactly ... build refinery capacity up there Trajan Apr 2013 #5
Labor is cheaper in Texas than in Alberta daleo Apr 2013 #23
If they refined it in place they would still have to transport it to be shipped. Their ports freeze Vincardog Apr 2013 #6
I don't understand your answer GitRDun Apr 2013 #11
If they built refineries in Canada . . . another_liberal Apr 2013 #12
You guys are right on I think GitRDun Apr 2013 #15
Like so many other things, the current plan serves Charles and David Koch.......... wandy Apr 2013 #13
You mentioned climate... ReRe Apr 2013 #20
The largest selling product from the Tar Sands is syncrude FogerRox Apr 2013 #25
I can tell you why. kentauros Apr 2013 #32
The citizens in Alberta want that too. The climate there is not an issue laundry_queen May 2013 #45
Sheesh! GitRDun May 2013 #47
Who is paying for the Nite Owl Apr 2013 #4
They do not pay into the clean up fund because their sludge is not oil. Vincardog Apr 2013 #8
And they should pay rent EC Apr 2013 #9
I hope the EPA has some clout. Bannakaffalatta Apr 2013 #7
I don't think any agency with the word 'environmental' in it has any clout these days. olddad56 Apr 2013 #10
what`s needed is higher strength seamless corrosive proof steel . madrchsod Apr 2013 #14
Charles Pierce: Coming Down The Pipeline eridani Apr 2013 #16
guess I'm not the only with that horrible foreboding G_j Apr 2013 #24
only 45 days for public comment and they will trashcan those comments anyway. Sunlei Apr 2013 #28
I have said it 100 times for years. build refinaries right on the tar sands. Sunlei Apr 2013 #17
They have. #1 product from Tar Sands is syncrude, not bitumen. FogerRox Apr 2013 #26
good and I wish China and the Corp. investors would build their bitumen refinary there too. Sunlei Apr 2013 #27
Well, i wish you'd stop saying it then, Bannakaffalatta Apr 2013 #39
It's easy for the EPA to talk tough now that they know the fix is in byeya Apr 2013 #18
what fix G_j Apr 2013 #21
My guess is that the XL pipeline has already been approved and the EPA can seem to be byeya Apr 2013 #29
unfortunately G_j Apr 2013 #31
Tar sands are toxic, abrasive and corrosive. PDJane Apr 2013 #30
Who's going to convince the Harpoons? Bannakaffalatta Apr 2013 #40
Tar Sands kill, Oil pipelines spill riverbendviewgal Apr 2013 #33
Yes, I did know. PDJane Apr 2013 #34
Did you see the movie? riverbendviewgal Apr 2013 #35
No, I haven't. PDJane Apr 2013 #36
It is playing in the empire theatres riverbendviewgal Apr 2013 #37
wish it came out sooner in the US G_j Apr 2013 #38
That's playing right near my place laundry_queen May 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tar Sands Pipelines Shoul...