Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
2. Why?
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:04 PM
Apr 2013

Been a TMo customer for years. No complaints. I've had far fewer customer service and network problems with them than I have had with AT&T or Verizon.

The only real problem with TMo is their coverage. 4G coverage tends to be really good in low rise cities, middling in high rise cities, and appallingly bad in rural areas. Their LTE network is blazing fast, but it's only available in a handful of cities.

But if someone is aleady a Metro customer, and TMo is simply picking up the existing Metro infrastructure, I don't see how existing Metro customers would lose anything. They'd still have access to the same towers and coverage they are already using.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MetroPCS shareholders app...»Reply #2