Latest Breaking News

krispos42

(49,445 posts)

43. Incorrect.

Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:24 PM

Apr 2013

My point is that a suspected terrorist is not a convicted anything. There has been no due process to remove constitutional rights.

If people on the terrorist watch list lost their right to vote, or to privacy, or to faith, or to privacy, or to a lawyer, would you still support this?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill on sale of explosive powder introduced in US Congress [View all] Judi Lynn Apr 2013 OP

What is an explosive powder? Flour? Downwinder Apr 2013 #1

Yeah it is.... DeSwiss Apr 2013 #4

The article says: black powder, black powder substitute, or smokeless powder Tx4obama Apr 2013 #5

Flour is only explosive as a suspended dust; not a threat in bomb-making. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #8

OK. How about powdered aluminum and powdered iron? Downwinder Apr 2013 #10

That's not explosive but very hot and will cut through steel. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #11

Will weld a trolley to the track before the light turns green. Downwinder Apr 2013 #13

How many die or wounded from shrapnel from a welded trolley? Not explosive. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2013 #14

What websites have you been perusing that you have such enthusiasm for such mixtures? eom Kolesar Apr 2013 #21

Just harkening back to my inglorious youth. Downwinder Apr 2013 #38

It'll be defined retroactively in practice. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #30

They might as well.... DeSwiss Apr 2013 #2

It will be interesting to see what excuses the GOPers come up with to oppose this bill. n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #3

"suspected terrorist" krispos42 Apr 2013 #17

Oh, we cant ban purchase of propane, so we should not ban any explosive? Kolesar Apr 2013 #22

Incorrect. krispos42 Apr 2013 #43

Waiting for the bill requiring background checks to buy pressure cookers. NYC Liberal Apr 2013 #6

So true Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #7

The right of the people to keep and bear pressure cookers shall not be infringed. tclambert Apr 2013 #18

A well regulated kitchen, being necessary to the feeding of a hungry family groundloop Apr 2013 #31

I keep forgetting the well regulated kitchen part . . . tclambert Apr 2013 #40

First they came for my pressure cooker and I did nothing... Javaman Apr 2013 #25

LMAO. Hoyt Apr 2013 #28

Bwahaha, good luck on that! sofa king Apr 2013 #9

see 22 Kolesar Apr 2013 #23

see 43 sofa king Apr 2013 #47

I'd read elsewhere here dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #12

Does that cover explosive-powder-containing bullets? /nt Ash_F Apr 2013 #15

Shhhhhhh....nt Javaman Apr 2013 #26

bullets don't contain powder gejohnston Apr 2013 #41

Cartridge. Thanks nerd /nt Ash_F Apr 2013 #42

thanks for the complement gejohnston Apr 2013 #45

Modern Gunpowder Mr. X Apr 2013 #44

true, but if gejohnston Apr 2013 #46

well here in Ohio maindawg Apr 2013 #16

Includes fireworks right? ileus Apr 2013 #19

There are no politicians mainstreetonce Apr 2013 #20

My asshole neighbor sets them off at midnight Kolesar Apr 2013 #24

That's satire, right? The same Senate that refused gun background checks? sinkingfeeling Apr 2013 #27

Thankfully we won our lawsuit over the ATF ripcord Apr 2013 #29

The NAR/TRA suit was rather ground-breaking. SeattleVet Apr 2013 #39

Another useless bill premium Apr 2013 #32

Don't forget Matches formercia Apr 2013 #33

Wait....what? Marrah_G Apr 2013 #34

THIS--> "We can't even get background check on the guns that that powder goes into." Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #36

Better Than NOTHING! cynzke Apr 2013 #35

We May Not Stop Terrorists. cynzke Apr 2013 #37