Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
4. The problem is something called "breakthrough"
Wed May 1, 2013, 09:42 AM
May 2013

Controlled fusion reaction requires a "break through" in technology, and that is completely unpredictable. It could happen tomorrow, or we could spend hundreds of billions of dollars for centuries and never achieve it. It is, at this point a complete pipe dream, because so far we have not even come close. We have been trying for decades and are still not within an order of magnitude of achieving it.

I certainly do not advocate expansion of nuclear energy, or even the continued relaince on it, but to advocate against it based on the argument that we can replace it with fusion energy is simply wild eyed speculation. We cannot abandon what we have based on the hope for something that is extermely unlikely to happen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'A very fragile situation...»Reply #4