Harvard Professor apologizes for Keynes comments

[Jack Rabbit]

15. Hmmmmm . . .

Would Ferguson suggest heterosexuality as a determining factor in his perversely positive view of imperialism?

It would be silly, and as one who regards imperialism as little more than slavery on a national scale, where instead of an individual in bondage having no right to collect wages on his labor, but instead seeing them go to a self-sppointed master, a subjugated nation has no right to exploit its own natural resources but instead sees the control of its wealth pass to another self-appointed tyrant, the mother country.

And exactly where does Professor Ferguson get off saying Lord Keynes had no stake in the future and that he, as a straight man, does? There is ample evidence that Keynesian economic prescriptions work. That is a lot more than can be said for for austerity, a program designed to put the masses in poverty and keep them there. So exactly who is who is more concerned with the future, people like Keynes or people like Ferguson.

Quack, quack, professor.