Latest Breaking News

blm

(114,720 posts)

13. Are YOU reading all of the reports?

Mon May 6, 2013, 03:43 PM

May 2013

The way this is reading is wing nut exaggeration, offering interpretations to fit a preferred scenario instead of sticking strictly to facts exactly as occurred at the time.

I am no Hillary fan, but, there is no way on earth she would have been lax in this regard as it goes completely against her hawkish nature and her entire future plans for a center-right run for president. She LIKES the tougher than thou advantage for campaign politics. She would have liked nothing more than to get with Panetta and pull off a rescue mission IF it could have been pulled off as the RWers like to claim.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Diplomat claims US forces told to stand down in Benghazi [View all] Freddie Stubbs May 2013 OP

These fools are still stuck on Benghazi? Cali_Democrat May 2013 #1

Old news - the victims were already dead and the murderers gone by then. There was no 'rescue' blm May 2013 #2

That's not exactly true B2G May 2013 #6

Your 'facts' differ from the Pentagon timeline? Who would've been saved? blm May 2013 #8

Don;t play dumb. B2G May 2013 #9

Who would've been rescued? blm May 2013 #10

Those who were injured & killed at the Annex B2G May 2013 #11

Are YOU reading all of the reports? blm May 2013 #13

6 hours went by B2G May 2013 #14

The annex was in Libya, where we didn't have a military presence. geek tragedy May 2013 #24

And just curious B2G May 2013 #15

No - adding the timeline was to be useful to those pondering the question. blm May 2013 #19

I thank you for providing the timeline B2G May 2013 #21

No, the timeline does not prove your point. Bolo Boffin May 2013 #23

Check out the posting history. geek tragedy May 2013 #27

No - it doesn't prove your point. blm May 2013 #35

+1. Our friend here is testing the water. Buzz Clik May 2013 #33

Which time zone do your time stamps refer to ? dipsydoodle May 2013 #47

The ultimate point, John2 May 2013 #16

I believe the jury is still out on that B2G May 2013 #17

And that is EXACTLY what the GOP pols are doing with this - trying to save THEIR blm May 2013 #18

Then let them prove it again. B2G May 2013 #20

Yeah, we want the thorough answering of questions just like Bush did for 9-11, right? blm May 2013 #36

Its a witch hunt creeksneakers2 May 2013 #41

Seems to be what happened at hearing Wednesday, elleng May 2013 #45

The Pentagon had 40 minutes before it was attacked Politicalboi May 2013 #28

BLM may be right - the 2 Seals who died the next morning were not at the consulate, karynnj May 2013 #34

CNN reporting similar, but also reporting the Roselma May 2013 #3

Could someone around the CIA have been trying for a Shock & Awe 2.0? patrice May 2013 #4

"For me,� he said, �the Taliban is on the inside of the [State Department]." SpankMe May 2013 #5

Getting more and more like fake news Kingofalldems May 2013 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Blandocyte May 2013 #12

Rescue attempt may itself have turned into a clusterfuck. Relying on the Libyan military? TwilightGardener May 2013 #22

I am confused. cstanleytech May 2013 #25

Yikes. If Hicks has any credibility, this could be explosive. leveymg May 2013 #26

How? He's a Republican hack who wasn't part of the WH/State/CIA/Pentagon deliberations nt geek tragedy May 2013 #29

He was the acting Ambassador after Stevens' death. That gives him enough leveymg May 2013 #31

He is quite credible, imo. elleng May 2013 #43

Unless they were flying there in a DeLorean, once again Benghazi Truthers got nothing. n/t Bolo Boffin May 2013 #30

We were sent on several "rescue missions" in Nam.... 4bucksagallon May 2013 #32

I dont get it. DCBob May 2013 #37

Wouldn't have hurt him, imo. elleng May 2013 #44

I agree.. and in fact it didnt. DCBob May 2013 #46

Looks like another false story posted in LBN Kingofalldems May 2013 #38

not false Enrique May 2013 #39

The Guardian has a longer article alp227 May 2013 #40

Hearing on C-SPAN now. elleng May 2013 #42