Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
13. With virtually no liability coverage, it's a race against time.
Tue May 7, 2013, 11:32 AM
May 2013

The company itself is unlikely to survive the legal fallout, but the company is just a shield for the individuals who already got rich cutting corners.

That explosion probably blew out eardrums on the other side of town, and must have damaged dozens of homes and businesses and hundreds of cars. Probably hundreds of millions in damages, when all the suits are filed.

I'm sure the owners will find a way to liquidate most of the company's assets and drop them into a legal defense fund while giving themselves a 200% raise for the decade-long duration of the trials.

Then when the first round of decisions comes down against them, the company will declare bankruptcy and the perps will walk away richer than they would have been had the explosion not happened, while the victims get nothing. I cite generally the meat-packing, tobacco, oil, and pharmaceutical industries as prior examples of how to get rich and escape personal liability while running out the clock and waiting for the aggrieved to grow old and die.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So will the owner go to prison for leaving such huge quantities onsite? Nah, he's rich. nt valerief May 2013 #1
How much was there? And how much did they need this time of year.. pipoman May 2013 #4
They had as of 2012 270 tons of ammonium timdog44 May 2013 #10
lots of problems with this it seems.. pipoman May 2013 #11
Permited by Fire Dept? or DHS? One_Life_To_Give May 2013 #17
I am sure it has to be timdog44 May 2013 #18
SARA title 3 required reporting to the Fire Dept. One_Life_To_Give May 2013 #19
and probably a donor to cement head perry. nt Javaman May 2013 #6
duh heaven05 May 2013 #2
No shit nt LiberalEsto May 2013 #3
Sherlock Holmes would be proud. And it only took three weeks. Buzz Clik May 2013 #5
They are still trying to connect the dots after learning about the fire on an arson hotline Brother Buzz May 2013 #16
No shit Dick Tracy appleannie1 May 2013 #7
Any recent word on the legal issues? Jerry442 May 2013 #8
I see a lot John2 May 2013 #9
With virtually no liability coverage, it's a race against time. sofa king May 2013 #13
I don't know if the company or even the owner had a lot of assets LeftInTX May 2013 #15
So maybe his clock will run out first. sofa king May 2013 #22
Ahh, durr... bobclark86 May 2013 #12
And all this time I thought it was criminal negligence. Scuba May 2013 #14
Best response yet. nt Earth_First May 2013 #20
Their subtle spin tells gullible readers that a substance, not a person, was responsible. Scuba May 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ammonium Nitrate Was Caus...»Reply #13