Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)

19. SARA title 3 required reporting to the Fire Dept.

Reply to timdog44 (Reply #18)

Tue May 7, 2013, 06:12 PM

May 2013

That is a 1986 Law. THis is the first I have heard that the company was in violation of SARA as opposed to the DHS Proposed Rule for Ammonium Nitrate Security. Title 3 is also known as the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know act. It provides Emergency Responders with information for planning purposes etc. Although it restricts who is allowed to receive this information to the emergency services.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ammonium Nitrate Was Cause of Texas Explosion, State Agency Says [View all] Hissyspit May 2013 OP

So will the owner go to prison for leaving such huge quantities onsite? Nah, he's rich. nt valerief May 2013 #1

How much was there? And how much did they need this time of year.. pipoman May 2013 #4

They had as of 2012 270 tons of ammonium timdog44 May 2013 #10

lots of problems with this it seems.. pipoman May 2013 #11

Permited by Fire Dept? or DHS? One_Life_To_Give May 2013 #17

I am sure it has to be timdog44 May 2013 #18

SARA title 3 required reporting to the Fire Dept. One_Life_To_Give May 2013 #19

and probably a donor to cement head perry. nt Javaman May 2013 #6

duh heaven05 May 2013 #2

No shit nt LiberalEsto May 2013 #3

Sherlock Holmes would be proud. And it only took three weeks. Buzz Clik May 2013 #5

They are still trying to connect the dots after learning about the fire on an arson hotline Brother Buzz May 2013 #16

No shit Dick Tracy appleannie1 May 2013 #7

Any recent word on the legal issues? Jerry442 May 2013 #8

I see a lot John2 May 2013 #9

With virtually no liability coverage, it's a race against time. sofa king May 2013 #13

I don't know if the company or even the owner had a lot of assets LeftInTX May 2013 #15

So maybe his clock will run out first. sofa king May 2013 #22

Ahh, durr... bobclark86 May 2013 #12

And all this time I thought it was criminal negligence. Scuba May 2013 #14

Best response yet. nt Earth_First May 2013 #20

Their subtle spin tells gullible readers that a substance, not a person, was responsible. Scuba May 2013 #21