Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,170 posts)
23. In this case, because he didn't actually take any child, I guess
Wed May 8, 2013, 05:22 AM
May 2013

He pled guilty to the charges, and I suppose that, if it went to court, they could have tried a defence of "it was all only a fantasy - he wouldn't have dared to try and do it in reality". He had the photos of child abuse, so that should carry a heavy sentence, since he's an accomplice to the abuse of those children, but I don't think they've been handing out life for possession of child pornography.

If he does serve 27 years, it'll take him to his late 60s, and after that time in prison, he'll hopefully be in no state to be a threat to others.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only 27 years? geek tragedy May 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalEsto May 2013 #2
You don't seriously think this is funny, do you? Brigid May 2013 #10
Are you really advertizing yourself as a first class jerk? theHandpuppet May 2013 #11
What a despicable comment, something I'd expect from asshat freepers. Welcome to ignore. snagglepuss May 2013 #14
LiberalEsto? irisblue May 2013 #15
You're right, it's not. LiberalEsto May 2013 #16
Diduca only got 18 years? ReRe May 2013 #3
Should've stuck a doobie between his fingers... KansDem May 2013 #7
Believe it or not... ReRe May 2013 #8
Believe it or not... theHandpuppet May 2013 #12
Wow, that went right over your head, didn't it? ReRe May 2013 #17
Oh, I understood all right theHandpuppet May 2013 #18
Comprende! n/t ReRe May 2013 #26
Comensurate. Commiserate is to share saddness, of which we should be doing plenty. /nt TheMadMonk May 2013 #21
Thanks for the correction! :-) n/t ReRe May 2013 #25
Commensurate slor May 2013 #36
Actually, possession of small amounts of marijuana is not currently a felony in most (if any) nomorenomore08 May 2013 #30
hell PD Turk May 2013 #22
"worldwide network of offenders" ? Myrina May 2013 #4
Yikes, sounds like something from "Criminal Minds." The Velveteen Ocelot May 2013 #5
I was thinking that it sounded like a Grimm's fairy tale, LuvNewcastle May 2013 #6
I stumbled on this guy who posted a Parenti video: freshwest May 2013 #9
I hope the FBI is tracking him--maybe it's an FBI plant? n/t zazen May 2013 #27
I would hope he's a plant - but I've seen some shocking stuff on youtube. At one time, they had CS. freshwest May 2013 #28
Come on, people, join PROTECT. proverbialwisdom May 2013 #13
Nobody wakes up at 40 wickerwoman May 2013 #19
yes and no? MH1 May 2013 #35
why are these evil vermin getting such light sentences? magical thyme May 2013 #20
In this case, because he didn't actually take any child, I guess muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #23
it is crimes like this that boggles my mind. Whenever I hear of a capital crime - I try to imagine Douglas Carpenter May 2013 #24
Quick google yielded this picture of Geoffrey Portway, and a lot more perps: freshwest May 2013 #29
They used to gripe at young mothers for being overprotective... ReRe May 2013 #33
Like Gilles de Rais. A monster out of a fairy tale, but real. nomorenomore08 May 2013 #31
Giving credit where credit is due, though I have been highly biased against this prosecutor. proverbialwisdom May 2013 #32
May 14 Facebook post by PROTECT.ORG proverbialwisdom May 2013 #34
Good work, all. proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Briton with dungeon who p...»Reply #23