Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Tierney Files "Safe-Gun" Legislation [View all]primavera
(5,191 posts)43. And what alternative is gun culture encouraging to promote gun safety/responsibility?
Trigger locks? No, that's right, you guys don't like those, do you? Mandatory gun safety training in order to obtain a license? No, I don't hear any gun owners standing up for that. Expanded background checks to keep fewer guns from getting into the hands of criminals and lunatics? Huh, yeah, well, we've seen how well that went over with the gun crowd. Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever heard a gun nut offer up so much as a single suggestion for how to reduce gun accidents or violence, all they ever seem to offer are rationalizations why any effort to reduce gun violence is doomed to fail and/or meaningless. So, really you don't have anything even remotely helpful to contribute to the discussion, do you?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lots of manufacturers include them with new guns. New ones can be had for $5...
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#47
If it can be retrofitted onto an existing gun, it can be removed from a stolen gun.
AtheistCrusader
May 2013
#9
Maybe so, but technology would improve quickly. More importantly those guns irresponsible gunners
Hoyt
May 2013
#10
Of course you can't understand- you're no different than the people that ban bongs...
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#18
And apparently you are no different that those who believe their guns don't stink.
Hoyt
May 2013
#20
"Restricting guns will help our society" Hadn't you noticed that they already are?
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#25
"society would be better off with a lot less guns and gun cultists."
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#29
Well maybe gun manufacturers should stop production until technology is to your satisfaction.
Hoyt
May 2013
#37
Umm, don't you mean "to mine and the other gun Prohibitionists' satisfaction"?
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#38
Undoubtedly the reign of tears will be over, and the slums will be a memory.
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#42
And what alternative is gun culture encouraging to promote gun safety/responsibility?
primavera
May 2013
#43
You seem not to have heard the people like me that advocated for these things here.
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#45
You don't understand because for a firearm to WORK is not your top priority.
AtheistCrusader
May 2013
#49
It's the reason my AR has an adjustable stock. You know, one of the 'evil features'.
AtheistCrusader
May 2013
#55
Maybe the NRA can cough up some of thier extremist RW loony dough to help make it work.
baldguy
May 2013
#12
Or maybe Michael Bloomberg can cough up some of *his* billions to help make it work.
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#17
You know what? You're right; Bloomie (like the NRA) is too smart to fall for vaporware.
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#30
True, but as we've seen it plays well with the dogmatic and willfully ignorant
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#19
So. You get stuck with a bunch of worthless guns that you never should have bought.
Hoyt
May 2013
#46
Yes, but the republicans shoot him down because he's actually concerned about innocent lives.
Hoyt
May 2013
#48
It's more likely that his faith-based proposals interfere with theirs...
friendly_iconoclast
May 2013
#65