Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)

21. It is my understanding that it is just the phone numbers and dates of the calls.

Reply to BainsBane (Reply #8)

Thu May 16, 2013, 07:52 PM

May 2013

That's all they would need in the initial stages of an investigation of a leak.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another Obama ‘Scandal’? Nope… GOP Rep Claims Responsibility For AP Surveillance [View all] Galraedia May 2013 OP

so now the administration's Amen Choir here can start to criticize the DOJ overreach? villager May 2013 #1

don't know where to go with that bluemarkers May 2013 #2

Bam! Control-Z May 2013 #3

It's not a question of who demanded it BainsBane May 2013 #4

Sorry. But the Supreme Court ruled that a pen register, that is a listing of phone numbers JDPriestly May 2013 #7

Did they just seize phone numbers in the AP case BainsBane May 2013 #8

It was numbers and timestamps. Jesus, that information is all over the web! randome May 2013 #9

I do have a job BainsBane May 2013 #12

Sorry. Did not mean to come across as rude. randome May 2013 #13

I'm reading up on it now BainsBane May 2013 #15

A gracious and fair-minded reply. And exactly how liberal should react... ms liberty May 2013 #23

um, I have a job too zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #16

well, I imagine there are many things I know BainsBane May 2013 #17

you can imagine all you want zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #19

Really? BainsBane May 2013 #26

You can wiggle out of this by using this well-known Rumsfeld backstop Samantha May 2013 #25

derp BainsBane May 2013 #27

yes, that does seem appropriate for you zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #44

wriggle out of what exactly? zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #43

Um, I don't have a job timdog44 May 2013 #32

huh, so romeysbain zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #45

I guess I will timdog44 May 2013 #46

Some people have more time consuming jobs than others obama2terms May 2013 #42

It is my understanding that it is just the phone numbers and dates of the calls. JDPriestly May 2013 #21

They had a subpoena. Did you not know that? randome May 2013 #10

It's an administrative subpoena issued by the department, never reviewed by cali May 2013 #37

Republicans blocked a bill that would have made it illegal Galraedia May 2013 #14

+1. Fell in their own trap. freshwest May 2013 #28

The way I understand it, John2 May 2013 #30

Thinking Back! cynzke May 2013 #33

That got an administrative supoena BainsBane May 2013 #34

they didn't get a warrant. they issued their own administrative subpoena cali May 2013 #38

K&R :) Tx4obama May 2013 #5

K&R! sheshe2 May 2013 #6

WTH, was he thinking? Connecting some dots with reality Cha May 2013 #11

totally predictable-- the most serious "scandal" NoMoreWarNow May 2013 #18

LOL! Be careful what you ask for because Gman May 2013 #20

K/R CakeGrrl May 2013 #22

Imagine that Hekate May 2013 #24

You know, this just gets better & better. Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #29

Guess it's going to be awhile before Rep. Gowdy gets another invite to Fox News. tanyev May 2013 #31

Too late. Obama already took credit for it via "I make no apologies" nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #35

The GOP isn't even trying to hide their tactics: tofuandbeer May 2013 #36

No one's talking about restraining gun violence or the sequester now, and both are killing people. freshwest May 2013 #40

K&R freshwest May 2013 #39

Yup. Up2Late May 2013 #41

After reading this entire thread timdog44 May 2013 #47