Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New Documents Reveal How a 1980s Nuclear War Scare Became a Full-Blown Crisis [View all]Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)24. All life on earth would likely be snuffed out by even a limited nuclear exchange
in a couple of months time, due to dust clouds in the atmosphere that would block photosynthesis. Plants dead; animals next. See Carl Sagan's "The Cold and the Dark."
The horrors of immediate mass death by even a limited nuclear exchange, plus the horrors of radiation poisoning, would not be the end of it.
This is why humanity must give up nuclear weapons. The risks of a limited nuclear exchange are greater than the risks of an all-out nuclear exchange. The demise of the Soviet Union, for instance, has not diminished the risk of the end of life on earth from nuclear weapons.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New Documents Reveal How a 1980s Nuclear War Scare Became a Full-Blown Crisis [View all]
bananas
May 2013
OP
Yeah, but luckily, the risk of full-blown global nuclear war is minute today, compared to 1983-84.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#13
Dont be so sure: There was another incident in 1995 that could easily happen today as well.
stevenleser
May 2013
#18
Yes, I've heard of that, Steve. It doesn't really change the facts at all, though.
AverageJoe90
May 2013
#19
It might be a fluke, but this only has to go the wrong way 1 time. That's whats so scary about it.
stevenleser
May 2013
#21
There's a factor of escalating regional war in MENA and the Gulf that increases the risks
leveymg
May 2013
#51
As a middle-schooler in the mid-80s, I remember being terrified that Raygun and Andropov......
marmar
May 2013
#6
All life on earth would likely be snuffed out by even a limited nuclear exchange
Peace Patriot
May 2013
#24
Our intelligence agencies needed a threat to keep the funding flowing in. To react is an admission
alfredo
May 2013
#27
Iran hated the Taliban and al Qaeda, in part because they were Sunni. Iran even helped
alfredo
May 2013
#32
Our neo conservative movement was created by an old Trotskyite. They weren't anti
alfredo
May 2013
#35
I think the neocons are aware of Irving Kristol's past. He was quite open about his
alfredo
May 2013
#43
Old Bush &the Saudis conspired to overproduce oil and drive down the price of the Soviets' ...
Kolesar
May 2013
#22
A study revealed the 90% of the Air Force missile fleet would probably not work
Kolesar
May 2013
#50
A former launch officer told me the same thing in the early '80s. But, the remainder that would
leveymg
May 2013
#52
Except for the inaccurate premise that NORAD has anything to do with launching nukes. NORAD
24601
May 2013
#44
My dad was stationed at SAC 75-80. That's when we had the looking glass planes there. i
okaawhatever
May 2013
#47
This is a good example of words having power. Too much bellicose rhetoric is a bad deal.
Selatius
May 2013
#15