Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Exclusive: Woman Who Asked IRS's Lois Lerner Scandal-Breaking Question Details Plant [View all]John1956PA
(5,118 posts)31. You and I agree 100%. As an aside, here is my LTTE of yesterday to a local newspaper.
Yesterday, May 17, the online version of a local newspaper published a slanted poll which might be described as a "push" poll. The the poll question began, " It appears the IRS has targeted conservative nonprofit groups for extra scrutiny because they disagree with President . . ." The poll asked how that activity by the IRS made the reader feel. The three choices the reader could select from to answer the poll were: "Outraged", "Afraid", and "Disappointed."
In my letter to the editor, I wrote the following:
"Slanted" is the term to describe the News' May 17 poll regarding the IRS's heightened scrutiny of applications for non-profit status submitted by certain organizations.
Is has not been proven that applications submitted by conservative groups were singled out. The preliminary indications are that political groups from both ends of the spectrum, liberal and conservative, were targeted for heightened scrutiny, since an organization is required to limit its political activities if Section 501(c)4 non-profit status is to be granted.
An IRS spokesperson apologized for the method of targeting conservative groups. That method involved using certain conservative groups' names or bywords as the criteria for review. However, liberal terms may have been used as the criteria for pulling up liberal groups applications for heightened scrutiny. The IRS had not yet answered that question.
Regardless, there has been no indication by the IRS that applications from conservative groups were subjected to heightened scrutiny just because of the groups' ideology.
Is has not been proven that applications submitted by conservative groups were singled out. The preliminary indications are that political groups from both ends of the spectrum, liberal and conservative, were targeted for heightened scrutiny, since an organization is required to limit its political activities if Section 501(c)4 non-profit status is to be granted.
An IRS spokesperson apologized for the method of targeting conservative groups. That method involved using certain conservative groups' names or bywords as the criteria for review. However, liberal terms may have been used as the criteria for pulling up liberal groups applications for heightened scrutiny. The IRS had not yet answered that question.
Regardless, there has been no indication by the IRS that applications from conservative groups were subjected to heightened scrutiny just because of the groups' ideology.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exclusive: Woman Who Asked IRS's Lois Lerner Scandal-Breaking Question Details Plant [View all]
notadmblnd
May 2013
OP
Clearly the GOP Congressional delegation conspired to make a big deal out of this.
Buzz Clik
May 2013
#24
Speaking as a career civil servant, I must disagree that there's nothing wrong with this. At a
24601
May 2013
#22
Just because we do not like what she did and how she did does not make her actions wrong.
Buzz Clik
May 2013
#25
It's really that the Treasury Report IG was going to reveal it and she moved to get ahead of the
24601
May 2013
#43
What about the requirment that these 501c(4) groups do no political endorsements?
brush
May 2013
#45
I've read on Crooks and Liars where Rove said he has gotten about 25 letters from the irs and ignore
okaawhatever
May 2013
#28
Gee, I visit the Crooks & Liars blog quite often and have seen no such thing........
rdharma
May 2013
#33
Here: It's from back in January, I think this is the one. They have been watchiing this way b4 now
okaawhatever
May 2013
#36
I never said an audit took place, just that crossroads had received letters from the irs probably
okaawhatever
May 2013
#41
I don't know how you can "ignore" a letter requesting additional information from the IRS. eom
rdharma
May 2013
#42
I don't know if the President appoints people @ her level to the IRS but the ....
Botany
May 2013
#18
No, Bush did not appoint her. Bush appointed the guy that selected her for that position
notadmblnd
May 2013
#27
I'm the one that said that based on an article I read early on. It said the position was new I
okaawhatever
May 2013
#38
I've read she's a dem, but alot of that was old info. She is a civil servant and had been with two
okaawhatever
May 2013
#29
Adelmam made enough money in the us to pay for those election dollars BUT I say that because he has
okaawhatever
May 2013
#30
I disagree with the clause "the agency was inappropriately targeting conservative groups."
John1956PA
May 2013
#21
You and I agree 100%. As an aside, here is my LTTE of yesterday to a local newspaper.
John1956PA
May 2013
#31
I agree with your analysis that the IRS "took the expedient route focusing on names."
John1956PA
May 2013
#37
Part of the problem we have with this is the bogus hearings in congress. Their questions are very
okaawhatever
May 2013
#32