Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8. It assumes nothing. ADHD pharmaceutical treatment is based on unfounded assumptions.
Tue May 21, 2013, 01:44 AM
May 2013

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, unlike schizophrenia is subjectively diagnosed often based on the testimony of teachers or parents. Often you can perform scans on those displaying schizophrenic tendencies and find concrete abnormalities within brain regions. The same can't be said for ADHD. In the majority of cases diagnosed as ADHD neurotransmitter testing will reveal little difference between those labelled ADHD and those considered healthy. When there are significant differences they are often indicative of existing manic depressive disorder and coincide with symptoms of this disorder, which is not treated with psychostimulants, quite to the contrary psychostimulants will aggravate such a disorder.
There is absolutely no concrete evidence that ADHD exists, if you can find it please do post it. As I said its a theory, as is the method of treatment. No one claims to understand how the drugs work with certainty, neither does anyone claim to know exactly what ADHD is on a biochemical level.
Yes I work with children on a daily basis and am familiar with the research that has been done into pediatric as well as adult neurochemistry, psychology and pharmacology.
There are thousands of doctors in the United States alone who will refuse to write a prescription for a stimulant. Many DO's will simply refer the children to a psychologist, not a psychiatrist, to investigate whether there is evidence of trauma or abuse in the child's history. Many DO's will also order diagnostic tests to determine if there might be thyroid abnormalities, heavy metal toxicity, vitamin deficiencies, hormonal irregularities etc.
I find your comparison to Scientology to be a leap. I have never claimed there is no such thing as mental illness , I simply argue there is a complete lack of objective evidence for the existence of ADHD as well as virtually no understanding or explanation offered for how such blunt effect drugs are supposed to work for adhd.
Something else I feel inclined to mention is that many children who are sent to a psychologist instead of a psychiatrist have been found to have been victims of trauma or abuse. What if instead those children had simply been put on a drug? The trauma and/or abuse may never have been identified. Psychological intervention is often able to help those victims of trauma and/or abuse live full normal lives.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The children for whom the drugs work are far from zombies. Some do need other kinds of answers. Ford_Prefect May 2013 #1
The children who are drugged deserve attention, not institutional drugging. socialsecurityisAAA May 2013 #3
What discipline is your medical degree in? upaloopa May 2013 #5
Your logic assumes a complete lack of responsible medical judgement on the part of ALL those who Ford_Prefect May 2013 #6
It assumes nothing. ADHD pharmaceutical treatment is based on unfounded assumptions. socialsecurityisAAA May 2013 #8
Oh bullshit. Zoeisright May 2013 #7
of course you are right. There was a pyscho-pop anti-scientific fad Douglas Carpenter May 2013 #13
True, but not so with Adhd. I explain in my response above there is no socialsecurityisAAA May 2013 #14
My family is full of ADHD marions ghost May 2013 #18
People who do not deal with ADHD don't really understand Drale May 2013 #26
poorer diet? "Children with Medicaid were more likely than uninsured children or privately insured Sunlei May 2013 #2
What you state is certainly part of the problem. Profits over people:( socialsecurityisAAA May 2013 #12
Thom Hartmann's ideas may be useful: freshwest May 2013 #4
Hartmann marions ghost May 2013 #19
It's the goddamned poison food, water and plastic! DeSwiss May 2013 #9
Great point. Many of those "poisons" are toxic hormonal disruptors. socialsecurityisAAA May 2013 #10
Indeed.... DeSwiss May 2013 #11
good video thanks marions ghost May 2013 #27
Welcome to DU gopiscrap May 2013 #30
Sugar n/t cprise May 2013 #15
Agreed, along with HFCS. DeSwiss May 2013 #22
You can say they were "created by science" cprise May 2013 #23
As long as capitalism owns science, its' our worse enemy. n/t DeSwiss May 2013 #24
Even academics?? cprise May 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Jake Izzy May 2013 #16
the study looked only at "white" and only males KurtNYC May 2013 #17
The study seems to reflect historical bias that ADHD is not often found in Girls or women. Ford_Prefect May 2013 #20
ADHD marions ghost May 2013 #28
That's because early on when these adults were kids ADHD was thought to be most prevalent WilmywoodNCparalegal May 2013 #21
Piss poor research technique in any case to apply such obvious and dated bias in defining the Ford_Prefect May 2013 #31
Interesting because my mom and dad were crack skinny and so was I but: gopiscrap May 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»ADHD in childhood may be ...»Reply #8