Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
35. The Republicans do not seem to understand the purpose of Congressional hearings.
Tue May 21, 2013, 06:25 PM
May 2013

Congress' authority to hold the hearings derives from the necessary and proper clause in Article I, section 8 of the Constitution.

The purpose of the hearings is not to embarrass or punish people but to determine whether laws are being properly carried out by the executive branch and whether the existing laws need to be changed better to reach the goals of the government.

For example, the reason for calling Apple executives before Congress is not to punish them. Congress doesn't have the authority to sentence the guilty. That's the job of the courts. Article III of the Constitution provides the structure of the courts and instructs on their authority.

Rand Paul puts himself out there as such an expert on the Constitution. Really?

Check Wikipedia on congressional oversight and the Constitution if you don't believe me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is no pretense any more. They just flat out pander to the overlords liberal N proud May 2013 #1
...and that really worries me. FiveGoodMen May 2013 #32
No, they don't WANT to do anything about it. Amonester May 2013 #55
Asshat. Change the tax laws kochsuckers like you created. nt onehandle May 2013 #2
Exactly! cynzke May 2013 #42
And how many DUers thought this guy was 'principled?' nt msanthrope May 2013 #3
It's just a facade Blue_Tires May 2013 #5
Oh he's principled. It's just that his principles suck. nt BenzoDia May 2013 #6
I don't know. How many? Hissyspit May 2013 #14
Rand Paul: Against drone strikes on Al Qaeda, for drone strikes against store robbery suspects. Dawson Leery May 2013 #51
I’m offended that a sniveling,rancid Flashmann May 2013 #4
He's just the continuation of his father. EC May 2013 #10
Well to be fair, his father was the imbecilic piece of shit in congress first.... n/t winterpark May 2013 #12
Well to be fair, his father was the imbecilic piece of shit in congress first Flashmann May 2013 #15
LMAO! crim son May 2013 #36
Why sure! Flashmann May 2013 #37
Thank you! crim son May 2013 #48
You are quite welcome Flashmann May 2013 #63
...a purely EVIL little bastard. SoapBox May 2013 #7
Gee, you'd think his salary depended on those big donors, mpcamb May 2013 #53
Just like when Barton EC May 2013 #8
Right! SCVDem May 2013 #62
WOW, doesn't that blow the GOP's concern for deficits to hell? sinkingfeeling May 2013 #9
Robert (Me) demands that Rand Paul appogozise for Drale May 2013 #11
The Rand iPaulogy Blue Owl May 2013 #13
lol Love it. ctsnowman May 2013 #16
well played! frylock May 2013 #28
Here: Galraedia May 2013 #57
This deserves a guest spot in "Pic of the Moment." Brigid May 2013 #60
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #17
You UNAMERICAN jerk Paul! If you want to send all of our money overseas, then LEAVE it! cascadiance May 2013 #18
Unfortunately, I don't think enough people are taking that word "unamerican" seriously enough, BUT patrice May 2013 #25
Fuck you Rand Paul, fuck you DainBramaged May 2013 #19
What jobs would he be talking about? Blue State Bandit May 2013 #20
Absolutely not......... Swede Atlanta May 2013 #21
Well said. nt SunSeeker May 2013 #27
Maybe they should get hungry kids to write notes of apology to Apple Politicub May 2013 #22
If Apple pays $7 billion in taxes this year then that more than covers the $4.8 bil KurtNYC May 2013 #44
Let me spell it out for you, Senator... RevStPatrick May 2013 #23
and to think I was trying to give Libertarians a break on my hypothesis that they love slavery. nt patrice May 2013 #24
What a tool BanzaiBonnie May 2013 #26
I do believe that squirrel on your head has chewed into your brain, Rand. nt SunSeeker May 2013 #29
And I demand Rand Paul apologize for whatever the hell that is, on his head. nt Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #30
Sane people demand Rand Paul Zoeisright May 2013 #31
Hey rand - you're in NO position to demand ANYTHING, pipsqueak! calimary May 2013 #33
I regret that I will not live sulphurdunn May 2013 #34
The Republicans do not seem to understand the purpose of Congressional hearings. JDPriestly May 2013 #35
+1 MustBeTheBooz May 2013 #41
"lickspittle popinjay". bemildred May 2013 #38
Fuck you, Rand Paul, you slimy smamy piece of shit! Harry Monroe May 2013 #39
Here's your apology, Curly Top. Beacool May 2013 #40
"You'd BETTER apologize, or I'll sic my 'private security detail' on you all!!" HughBeaumont May 2013 #43
I'm with you: "WTF?" sakabatou May 2013 #45
Rand Paul - a valiant hero to the filthy stinking rich bushisanidiot May 2013 #46
And this is why I firmly stand by my claim that hes the dumbest man weve ever elected to the senate. Initech May 2013 #47
Agreeing w/ Rand Steviehh May 2013 #49
Apple benefits from the infrastructure and education America provides, as well as Dawson Leery May 2013 #50
The taxpayers here just don't want to pay more taxes yet Apple gets out of paying taxes Rosa Luxemburg May 2013 #52
Rand....... shut up. We're still trying to live down Dukes of Hazzard, now you come along. alfredo May 2013 #54
And why should Congress ever obey to that other shmuck's order? Amonester May 2013 #56
ONLY when Kentucky apologizes for Rand benld74 May 2013 #58
Call it "1984"; Call it "bizarro world".... King_Klonopin May 2013 #59
Corporate bootlicker Rand Paul back at it again. Dash87 May 2013 #61
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rand Paul demands Congres...»Reply #35