Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Official: Dead Boston bombings suspect involved in 2011 slayings [View all]temmer
(358 posts)21. ...but a lot of people do...
...and they seem to have reason...look at the comments on Huffington Post...
The FBI will now say he made a death bed confession and so they don't need the statement signed. The judge will go along with it and he will be declared guilty. So, how soon will these statements disappear and a new updated story appear with the same article?
awfully convenient that he was shot before we could hear what he had to say....funny how anyone suspected in this case somehow ends up not being able to talk...
He was in questioning at the FBI, AND STILL HAD A KNIFE ON HIM? Do you really expect us to believe this fairy tail? This doesn't even sound plausible.
If the FBI says so, it must be so. I'm thinking Waco, Texas and the Wounded Knee incident, among others.
You know I am not going to accept these fantastic tales from the police and the FBI. We have just seen the awful event in London. The police shot and only wounded the perpetrator and they will eventually be questioned and put on trial. We get tall tales and dead people never get to tell their side of the story. We can not be so inept, so I can only assume this is just one more cover up and tall tale the government expects me to swallow without thinking. Its and insult to my intelligence.
You are about to get a confession and you KILL the suspect? Then we are just supposed to believe what you say they said? Was the FBI agent alone with the suspect?
I don't know police protocal but why wasn't he checked for a weapon in the 1st place? Seems like poor FBI work to me when a murder and potential terror suspect isnt searched before questioning!!
Soooooooooooo, a room full of various kinds of cops were questioning a murder suspect without patting him down, and were "unable" to restrain him? Hmmmmmmmmmm. Sounds perfectly credible to me.
interviewed earlier in the day.....but at midnight he needed to be interviewed again?....yeah, this is all above board
...and so on...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/22/ibragim-todashev-confession-tsarnaev-triple-murder_n_3322105.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's been pretty clear that the older Tsarnaev was involved in these homicides
alcibiades_mystery
May 2013
#2
that FBI and Mass State police killed this man without legitimate reason in Orlando is insane...
temmer
May 2013
#15
The poster expresses doubt about the crediblity of the FBI's story in this case,
truth2power
May 2013
#26