Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
17. I have 4 kids - 3 c-sections 1 VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean)
Sat May 25, 2013, 11:44 AM
May 2013

My pudgiest kid is the VBAC (she was baby #2). The others are all very skinny.

I think it's more genetics - the one that is pudgy has been that way since she was a baby. Even though all my kids were exclusively breastfed with no solids until 6 months, my vbac child at 6 months outweighed them by quite a bit (despite being the one that breastfed the least - she was the mythical 'every 4 hours' child, the others ate every 1-2 hours). She's now my most active child, and the one who is picky with food and she eats the least out of any of them - but she's definitely the largest. Purely genetics in this case.

There is several theories that actually tie into this - they recently discovered that children who had the most exposure to antibiotics were also the ones who were the heaviest. The theory with C-sections is that the babies don't benefit from bacteria present in the vaginal canal. It seems that bacteria in the gut may have something to do with obesity - this also ties in with breastfed babies having lower incidence of obesity - breast milk promotes beneficial bacteria in the gut. There you go big pharma - there's an avenue to consider - find the right probiotic strain that fights obesity and patent it - record profits instantly! lol.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

AH-HA AtheistCrusader May 2013 #1
Weird. Arugula Latte May 2013 #2
Blustein said studies haven't been able to prove whether C-section, itself, is a reason some babies Mass May 2013 #3
two C-section kids here, zero are obese. ileus May 2013 #4
Vaginal here; and Im fat as a whale NT.. Elmergantry May 2013 #5
Same here, for my one kid. tblue May 2013 #9
I have 4 kids - 3 c-sections 1 VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean) laundry_queen May 2013 #17
Is this just correlation or is it causation? There's a difference. sakabatou May 2013 #6
"Linked to" in science journalism[sic] is pretty much always correlation Posteritatis May 2013 #13
"Tied to" = correlation. Brickbat May 2013 #7
We'll get a bunch of "Well I'm a vaginal/C-section birth" blah blah blah posts here alcibiades_mystery May 2013 #8
Women don't "opt" for C-sections frazzled May 2013 #10
My wife was given the option for our last two michigandem58 May 2013 #21
It really isn't that simple of diet for example my mother is only 4'6 and I like most males Arcanetrance May 2013 #22
That is strange. Zoeisright May 2013 #11
Here's an interesting factual: LeftInTX May 2013 #14
I had 2 c-sectioms Danmel May 2013 #23
I don't see where they controlled for income or access to health care or immigration/origin KurtNYC May 2013 #25
Wow, more big babies are delivered caesarian. A shocker...not. kickysnana May 2013 #12
Yep, that was my thought fugop May 2013 #20
I've read elsewhere that it's because vaginally delivered babies get a dose... renate May 2013 #15
My daughter was born by Ceasarian dipsydoodle May 2013 #16
Related to difference in intestinal biome? mainer May 2013 #18
interesting point. could also be the 'shock' of c-section delivery, it's fast. PTS, I read... Sunlei May 2013 #19
I was delivered via C-section, and I had a serious weight problem as a kid Chakab May 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»C-sections tied to child ...»Reply #17