Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Assad is a serial liar, so who Know ? Nt Sand Wind May 2013 #1
So you think John2 May 2013 #2
Hear! Hear! another_liberal May 2013 #3
Ditto... IthinkThereforeIAM May 2013 #6
There Is so much disinformation here that I just dont know where to begin. Sand Wind May 2013 #7
I'm sure Russia will confirm or deny this soon. Putin has hardly been shy about acknowledging arms pampango May 2013 #4
This makes sense - I just hope that the conference happens and that there is some solution karynnj May 2013 #5
Those S-300's effective against cruise missiles? Adsos Letter May 2013 #8
It will be a long time before they are effective against anything hack89 May 2013 #9
True, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #10
If I were the Israelis I'd opt for the warehouse target, if possible. Adsos Letter May 2013 #12
Why wouldn't Russia send crews? another_liberal May 2013 #15
Because they are not stupid. hack89 May 2013 #17
They have sent crews for their weapons supplied to foreign lands before. another_liberal May 2013 #21
Then Russians will be killed hack89 May 2013 #22
You had better hope . . . another_liberal May 2013 #40
The Israelis are more than capable of handling the S-300 hack89 May 2013 #41
We will see. another_liberal May 2013 #44
Anyone who puts boots on the ground in Syria - Russians, Americans, Iranian, Israelis, British or pampango May 2013 #42
I agree. nt hack89 May 2013 #43
There are crews there right now. David__77 May 2013 #25
There may be Russians in Syria hack89 May 2013 #26
There are trainers there. For S-300, who knows? David__77 May 2013 #30
The Russians will not participate in combat hack89 May 2013 #31
There would be no reason for them to. David__77 May 2013 #33
The Israelis will take out any S-300 batteries hack89 May 2013 #37
In terms of foreign involvement "boots on the ground" is a step up from supplying weapons. pampango May 2013 #18
From what I have read, they are designed to be effective against cruise missiles too. pampango May 2013 #11
I can't imagine that Russia would be so stupid as to man them nt hack89 May 2013 #13
They did in Cuba . . . another_liberal May 2013 #16
Another move in the Great Game aristocles May 2013 #14
RIA Novosti: Doubts Cast Over Reported S-300 Deliveries to Syria Purveyor May 2013 #19
Latest: Russian missile shipment has reached Russia aristocles May 2013 #20
‘Assad is lying about possessing S-300 missiles' Sand Wind May 2013 #23
Have a link to the article, Sand Wind? nt DonViejo May 2013 #28
Easy to find, just google the first sentence bananas May 2013 #35
Reuters: Moscow suggests missiles have yet to reach Assad bananas May 2013 #36
Hard to say who is telling the truth at this point. roamer65 May 2013 #24
This s potentially not news... Swede Atlanta May 2013 #27
What a joke. jessie04 May 2013 #29
They're insurance against foreign intervention, not the rebels. Posteritatis May 2013 #34
Thanks a pantload, Vlad! MjolnirTime May 2013 #32
Syria's new anti-aircraft missiles will be game-changing, say defence analysts cqo_000 May 2013 #38
From the Guardian article: Russian S-300s ... may not be ready for months pampango May 2013 #39
They would never survives long enough to become combat ready hack89 May 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian S300 anti-aircraf...»Reply #1