Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
2. That doesn't really seem like all that much money for 220 conferences.
Sat Jun 1, 2013, 09:15 PM
Jun 2013

Considering the training needs for an organization of that size, whose employees must stay abreast of complex regulations and interpretations that change every year, those figures don't seem facially "excessive" to me, nor does the need to come together in conferences seem extraordinary -- again for an organization the size of the IRS whose work is rather complex. The need for organizational consistency would seem to be rather high, and face-to-face seminars can be a superior way to achieve that.

If you assume 200 employees per seminar it works out to about $1,000 per employee. Quality professional training and development are very expensive. IRS officials, accountants, auditors, etc. are generally highly educated professionals. Again, the figure doesn't seem necessarily high to me, although the devil is in the details.

I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't expect those figures to be out of line with the training and seminar budget for a comparable, private concern (not that you could find a precisely comparable private concern -- but I'm thinking something like Exxon-Mobil).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unfortunately, power tends to breed arrogance. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #1
That doesn't really seem like all that much money for 220 conferences. cheapdate Jun 2013 #2
Yeah, I'd want to know how many of their staff are attending them Posteritatis Jun 2013 #11
That was my first thought. freedom fighter jh Jun 2013 #12
This is 2013. former9thward Jun 2013 #16
Teleconferencing certainly is a good idea. freedom fighter jh Jun 2013 #18
It is not a question of trying to single out the IRS. former9thward Jun 2013 #19
Why start with the IRS? freedom fighter jh Jun 2013 #23
Suggestion box dicksmc3 Jun 2013 #24
I did. former9thward Jun 2013 #25
I don't like the IRS as much as the next person, but I can see all the negative news about them bloomington-lib Jun 2013 #3
Yes, like clockwork siligut Jun 2013 #7
The big change I'd advocate is that the IRS needs to prove their case in court before 24601 Jun 2013 #14
Issa and his gang of looneys Iliyah Jun 2013 #4
Lets not forget Andy823 Jun 2013 #5
that was the problem with push PatrynXX Jun 2013 #8
And why limit "oversight" to that three-year plan? deurbano Jun 2013 #13
And the billions of dollars that went missing in Iraq are no scandal at all. Rozlee Jun 2013 #6
not just missing but spent on things Iraq will never use PatrynXX Jun 2013 #9
Outrageous! Outrageous! Outrageous! MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #10
Ladies and Gentleman, premium Jun 2013 #15
We need to start investigating what Corporations spend on conferences. BlueJazz Jun 2013 #17
while i realize the rw anti-govenment sentiment behind much of this arely staircase Jun 2013 #20
"an unfortunate vestige from a prior era" ThoughtCriminal Jun 2013 #21
I simply do not understand why the IRS needs *any* conferences. Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IRS faces new scrutiny fo...»Reply #2