Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Claire McCaskill Blocks Air Force Officer Susan Helms' Nomination Over Military Sexual Assault [View all]lastlib
(28,021 posts)34. I think she actually is a little more forward-thinking......
...than many of us here give her credit for. She has a lousy constituency to think of though. If she doesn't at least look like she's representing them, she's likely to get the boot. These are the people who think Todd Akin was the bee's knees.......
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Claire McCaskill Blocks Air Force Officer Susan Helms' Nomination Over Military Sexual Assault [View all]
iandhr
Jun 2013
OP
Sen McCaskill misses those votes because she's busy making appearances on Mornin' Douche!
TheDebbieDee
Jun 2013
#37
I agree, and this is a correct move, however, I wish she was equally forward thinking on other
still_one
Jun 2013
#24
My recollection about the case was that it was a male office who dismissed the case.
mpcamb
Jun 2013
#18
Couldn't McCaskill have pulled a Rand Paul filibuster? And hmm, what would Akin do?
alp227
Jun 2013
#21