Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

24601

(4,142 posts)
29. Every individual serving rotation on the FISA court has been through Presidential Nomination and
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:02 PM
Jun 2013

Senate Confirmation as a Federal Judge.

The only exception would be a Presidential recess-appointed judge. I believe that there aren't any and that it's unlikely a judge would accept such a limited appointment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

an idiot Oklahoma Congressman denies he was briefed OKNancy Jun 2013 #1
Anybody can get elected and make up shit as they go along Cha Jun 2013 #5
Congress should be treated as we treat our children. juajen Jun 2013 #23
Hmmm. This issue, if used properly could be used to rid the nation of Kahuna Jun 2013 #2
after the wolves fiasco don't much care PatrynXX Jun 2013 #12
Don't care. Cha Jun 2013 #3
So how does that make spying on innocent Americans OK? Corruption Inc Jun 2013 #4
Everyone wants some transparency into this right? It's important for us to gain some info o BenzoDia Jun 2013 #6
Not everybody wants transparency Andy823 Jun 2013 #15
Well, Obama said he wants Americans to be "comfortable" with this snooping shit Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #22
FISA court (created under Carter) was also told and approved. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #7
FISA court - enlightenment Jun 2013 #27
Every individual serving rotation on the FISA court has been through Presidential Nomination and 24601 Jun 2013 #29
Citation please, enlightenment Jun 2013 #30
http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/courts_special_fisc.html 24601 Jun 2013 #31
They are federal judges but they enlightenment Jun 2013 #32
You are the one splitting hairs. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #36
Look, enlightenment Jun 2013 #37
I disagree with your interpretation. Their confirmation process makes them Article III officials 24601 Jun 2013 #39
I did not say they were beholden to enlightenment Jun 2013 #40
According to Obama the program didnt spy on americans. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #9
I guess that OWS was special PuffedMica Jun 2013 #18
Because CONGRESS--not the guy in the WHITE HOUSE--makes LAW. nt MADem Jun 2013 #10
Excellent point Andy823 Jun 2013 #13
Who signed the Patriot Act renewal into law? brentspeak Jun 2013 #25
After criticizing it heavily as a candidate. Psephos Jun 2013 #33
As far as I know, nothing in the act REQUIRES him to break Constitutional law askeptic Jun 2013 #28
But, Mr. President.. pmorlan1 Jun 2013 #8
I take it to mean the Bush/Cheney regime. asjr Jun 2013 #11
And Republicans lied about it 13 times. As usual. Berlum Jun 2013 #14
Some folks in Congress need to reread the Constitution struggle4progress Jun 2013 #16
The immunity is from the executive and judicial branches. Their own house can question them 24601 Jun 2013 #38
Hardly ever happens: five expulsions from the House and fifteen from the Senate since 1789 struggle4progress Jun 2013 #41
Finger pointing is lame. Ed Suspicious Jun 2013 #17
They want partisan finger pointing. A most useful distraction. n/t Psephos Jun 2013 #34
There is an important word in there: "Classified" BlueStreak Jun 2013 #19
The vast majority of classified material is available to every member of Congress. Most of them, 24601 Jun 2013 #42
That is simply not true. BlueStreak Jun 2013 #43
So. Herlong Jun 2013 #20
. . . after they were bought and paid for. snot Jun 2013 #21
Does that make it better? (NT) Heywood J Jun 2013 #24
Of course they were briefed... Adam-Bomb Jun 2013 #26
So? They were briefed that American's rights were being destroyed. It's OK then? Kablooie Jun 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Says Congress...»Reply #29