Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

John2

(2,730 posts)
44. Fair enough,
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:26 AM
Jun 2013

and I would expect the same from those posters, making claims, and trying to impunge my character.

As far as to your first point, the over 41,000 rebels are only estimates gathered from Wiki on the ongoing updates of the Syrian Civil War, anyone can look up. I don't assume that to be factual information at all but important information cross referenced with other sources from the opposing side or independent news sources, that I give more credence to. I believed that I have mentioned those souces in a general context, such as sources like the BBC, Guardian (not mentioned) and media sources from battle field field reports given to the Syrian media, Lebonese media, Iranian media, Iraqi media and Russian. Some of those reports have also came from, believe it or not Israeli sources and personel interviews actually from Assad himself given to foreign media, such as either recently to Argentina or Australia, which I don't remenber which. There has also been video of these battles over the Internet and atrocities ( such as the eating incident) by the opposition. The reports given to the Syrian media are after action reports that are very detailed in manner, moreso than the opposition.

They are very detailed in the fact, they even give the names and identies of the fighters from the opposition, either killed or capture after a battle. In fact, the three Westerners, including an American, was given to the Syrian media by the Syrian Army. A lot of these fighters were killed or captured in the last three weeks, during the battle in Quisar, at the same time, Wiki, started to give more specific numbers for both sides.

To your fourth point as far as transparency here, it might be helpful if some of your Posters supporting the opposition line would be also transparent to figure out where they are coming from on this forum. You don't know if they are part of some group or organization including the opposition or American interest group wanting War in the Middle East.

I have posted several times in this forum, which state I'm from and my political preference. I'm a natural born citizen of the United States. I'm neither religious or Arab. I'm not Jewish either. I'm a military veteran and was on active duty, during the Vietnam War, Cold War and through the first Gulf War. So you can assume from that, I have a good deal of military experience and have served tours over seas a number times. I came up through the ranks and has served in leadership positions. It includes information that I'm priviledged to, any other ordinary citizen that hasn't served is not privileged to know. I know about weapon systems and military strategy. I'm not privileged, even after serving on active duty to let you know some of the specifics. I know when a side is losing a War. I know bullshit information, when I come across it too, from my experience in the military. I can go on and on, but I hope that is enough for you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ummm..."armying?" Archae Jun 2013 #1
it could actually be a cool new word Skittles Jun 2013 #2
My bad. I fixed it. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #4
Actually, I like it as it was. Archae Jun 2013 #5
This gives me the same groovy feeling as the run-up to Iraq. delrem Jun 2013 #3
Well it's one way of changing the nation's focus! Boo! As awful as this snappyturtle Jun 2013 #6
Let's just leave Syria to the Syrians. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #7
I actually talked with Obama specifically about this a year ago DFW Jun 2013 #8
A "wholesale slaughter" shaayecanaan Jun 2013 #9
It doesn't take balls to confront syria, it takes stupidity.. bowens43 Jun 2013 #11
41,000 of the 80,000 Syrians killed are Alawite. "The dictator" killed them all? leveymg Jun 2013 #13
One of those was John2 Jun 2013 #19
How come we never heard about her here in America? leveymg Jun 2013 #21
Because the John2 Jun 2013 #27
Yara Abbas wasn't blond, but she was BRAVE. Jesus Malverde Jun 2013 #41
Very brave. leveymg Jun 2013 #46
Bullshit shaayecanaan Jun 2013 #50
Probably not. Xithras Jun 2013 #52
So, in other words, 100% of the government dead are Alawite? shaayecanaan Jun 2013 #53
Probably not 100%, but a substantial majority. Xithras Jun 2013 #54
This is just more ignorance... shaayecanaan Jun 2013 #55
First of all, John2 Jun 2013 #15
All your post is bad propaganda. Sand Wind Jun 2013 #16
I can understand, John2 Jun 2013 #18
The only one who should be providing sources here is you. Daniel537 Jun 2013 #32
It is no less, John2 Jun 2013 #36
Here are the sources for the claim that most Syrians killed are Alawite. leveymg Jun 2013 #39
Again, complete bullshit... shaayecanaan Jun 2013 #51
Alawites are being killed in disproportionate numbers. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #56
Is there any good propaganda? leveymg Jun 2013 #23
As you know, good or bad can have an another meaning than the moral perspective Sand Wind Jun 2013 #28
Oh, you mean entertaining propaganda. leveymg Jun 2013 #37
Great propaganda, I mean clever, but boring. I just cant stand your 'debate'. Sand Wind Jun 2013 #57
It depends on John2 Jun 2013 #38
The regime in Libya didn't have wholesale support from Putin. Assad does, always has. DFW Jun 2013 #30
completly off topic sdrake Jun 2013 #12
At the end of Kurosawa's film and the American spinoff, they are the closing words DFW Jun 2013 #29
Of course its going to happen , if there's a wrong decision to be made, Obama's the man do to it. bowens43 Jun 2013 #10
And that is why he John2 Jun 2013 #20
I don't think Obama has crossed that line at all. David__77 Jun 2013 #47
Stay. The Fuck. Out Of It. n/t TheBadWolf Jun 2013 #14
Amen. 7962 Jun 2013 #26
Here's an analysis of the options, from someone I trust ... Scuba Jun 2013 #17
There is other information, John2 Jun 2013 #22
So how would that create a good option? Scuba Jun 2013 #24
If I have information John2 Jun 2013 #33
A couple words leveymg Jun 2013 #40
Fair enough, John2 Jun 2013 #44
Thanks for that. leveymg Jun 2013 #45
I've been checking John2 Jun 2013 #49
Sounds bad, but let THEM have at it. None of them really want us around anyway. 7962 Jun 2013 #25
Whoever We Are Arming RobinA Jun 2013 #31
gee....what could possibly go wrong? madrchsod Jun 2013 #34
Did they ask the taxpayers who pay for those arms? Hubert Flottz Jun 2013 #35
Hey it worked in Afghanistan back in the 80's Marrah_G Jun 2013 #42
This is going to be epic fail Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #43
That would be a violation of international law and a war crime. Coyotl Jun 2013 #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Close to Deci...»Reply #44