Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
13. That might be the reason, but at a dump?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jun 2013

After the end of the War in Vietnam the US Army did a study on why the US Army failed, one of the reason was that the Viet Cong had become dependent on US dumps for much of their own supplies. US troops tended to do a lot of waste, batteries were replaced before any mission and thrown away, The Viet Cong used these almost dead batteries to provide electrical charges to the home made bombs they made and used against the US army.

Thus, the killing may be telling the natives NOT to deal with the Government, but also not to touch a Taliban Supply point. Possible, but why do it so close to a Check Point? It would be a way to tell everyone that Check point is meaningless.

While this is a POSSIBLE reason for this killing, I lean to it being someone else. I can NOT exclude this possibility but why kill someone you can use to get stuff from the dump? Thus possible but not probable,

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Inhumane. Boomerproud Jun 2013 #1
Disturbing story, but this typo made me laugh: ZombieHorde Jun 2013 #2
I noticed that too... KansDem Jun 2013 #3
It should have been the 10-year-old boy. n/t RebelOne Jun 2013 #5
Maybe they Turbineguy Jun 2013 #4
The Taliban Visited George H.W. Bush many times. red dog 1 Jun 2013 #6
What does that have to do with this? leftynyc Jun 2013 #23
Actually, I'm blaming both the Bush 41 AND Bush 43 Administrations for this disgusting bahavior red dog 1 Jun 2013 #29
Blaming the bush's for the leftynyc Jun 2013 #30
Calling me names does not validate your argument red dog 1 Jun 2013 #34
Awwww, poor baby doesn't like leftynyc Jun 2013 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author red dog 1 Jun 2013 #38
Why would the Taliban do this?? happyslug Jun 2013 #7
Religious fanatics rarely care about what's advisable shawn703 Jun 2013 #8
yes. Ed Suspicious Jun 2013 #10
What has this killing to do with religion????? happyslug Jun 2013 #12
As a warning to villagers not to co-operate with the Afghan government oberliner Jun 2013 #9
That might be the reason, but at a dump? happyslug Jun 2013 #13
What do you think is more probable? oberliner Jun 2013 #15
You have my two theories. happyslug Jun 2013 #16
Interesting oberliner Jun 2013 #24
Based on my own experience AND other news reports happyslug Jun 2013 #25
Gotcha oberliner Jun 2013 #28
It doesn't surprise me at all Marrah_G Jun 2013 #11
I do not know if you talking about the Taliban or our Afghan Allies happyslug Jun 2013 #14
So, your position is that though barbaric and monstrous, the geek tragedy Jun 2013 #17
A school girl or any children attending a school Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #18
This article is about a 10 year old and a 16 year old boy, not a girl in school happyslug Jun 2013 #26
I agree booley Jun 2013 #36
Bacha bazi (kept boys) from the military checkpoint or Talabin military? Sunlei Jun 2013 #19
That seems more likely Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #20
Yes, could be. How horrible to treat children this way. freshwest Jun 2013 #22
To young and to old. happyslug Jun 2013 #27
not in Afghanistan. boys are removed from homes, moved to the 'military areas very young to 'train' Sunlei Jun 2013 #32
Wikipedia is a good start on any research, but you have to be careful with it. happyslug Jun 2013 #33
looks like a 'respect' issue quadrature Jun 2013 #21
religion makes me blow chunks. nt boilerbabe Jun 2013 #31
And normal military operations are AOK?? happyslug Jun 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»2 children beheaded by mi...»Reply #13