Sen. Feinstein: Snowden's leaks are 'treason'

[Sirveri]

98. OK lets look it up on the SoS website then

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/

State Senate:
D9 Alameda had a run off between the Dem and Peace and Freedom candidate (it's also one of the most partisan districts in the state)
D13 Dem vs Dem (San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties)
D15 D vs D (Santa Clara County)
D33 D vs PF (LA)

39 total, but only odd numbered counties

State Assembly:
D1 R vs R (Butte, Shasta, etc...)
D2 D vs D (Humboldt, etc...)
D5 R vs R (Mono, Placer, etc...)
D6 R vs R (Sac, Placer, etc...)
D10 D vs D (Marin, Sonoma)
D14 D unopposed (This is my district, Contra Costa)
D15 D vs PF (Alameda, CC)
D18 D vs D (Alameda)
D19 D vs D (SF, San Mateo)
D20 D vs D (Alameda)
D23 R vs R (Fresno, Tulare)
D39 D vs D (LA)
D47 D vs D (San Bernadino)
D50 D vs D (LA)
D51 D vs D (LA)
D59 D vs D (LA)
D62 D vs D (LA)
D64 D Unopposed (LA)
D67 R vs R (Riverside)
D72 R vs R (Orange)
D76 R vs R (San Diego)

Out of 80 Districts.

So 4 out of 20 Senate races where between Leftist groups (which we were already going to win)
14 out of 80 assembly races, 2 were unopposed (which we obviously were going to win)
R's get 7 out of 80 assembly races. (Which they were going to win)

So the inland agricultural areas vote hard Republican, the major urban and metro areas vote hard Liberal. This shouldn't be much of a surprise (San Diego surprised me, but I suspect that's one of the more affluent suburbs of the county, the county itself split 3-3). Why are we unlikely to see a Federal Senate D vs D run off. The Repugs put up a candidate and gave her ZERO support and funding, and simply because she had an R next to her name she pulled enough votes to make the ballot, combined with Feinsteins name recognition, and you're not going to split the Dem vote enough to break the 37.5% the R pulled. Hell even Alameda country voted 18% for the Republican.