Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
41. I think there has been brutality down the ages. That said, there
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 02:03 PM
Jun 2013

was a time when it was considered cowardly to fight like Americans (hide, and don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes) and there were many examples recorded of gentlemanly conduct during WW1 (mostly because neither side particularly wanted to be there).

I do agree with you that video enables more "gotcha" moments these days. First person descriptions don't pack the same punch as a visual, in any event.

Peeing on the enemy is certainly not something that was invented in Iraq or Afghanistan. Nor was chopping someone open and going for their heart (and missing and grabbing a lung instead, apparently). It's just that we haven't seen the latter recently...!

A discussion on the subject, from the instructive folks at DISCOVERY: http://news.discovery.com/history/eating-the-enemy-130514.htm

More recently, former Liberian President Charles Taylor — sentenced last year to 50 years in prison for aiding and abetting rebels in Sierra Leone during the 1991-2002 civil war –was accused of ordering his militias to eat the flesh of captured enemies and UN soldiers. Taylor himself reportedly ate the heart and livers out of dead soldiers.


I'll bet they don't serve much heart or liver in prison...!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Humanitarian values? DeSwiss Jun 2013 #1
I find myself agreeing with Putin flamingdem Jun 2013 #2
I totally agree newfie11 Jun 2013 #12
That's because Putin has an interest in seeing US influence in the area wane...and if Iran wants to MADem Jun 2013 #24
Well of course that's what Vlad would say. One nitwit desecrates a corpse and he MADem Jun 2013 #3
I'm not clear about motive here flamingdem Jun 2013 #4
It's because regional actors are getting sick of Iran's interference. MADem Jun 2013 #26
What about Saudia Arabia's interference? Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #33
the French went into Mali and kicked out some attackers they held up paperwork the attackers left. Sunlei Jun 2013 #59
How is there cell footage heart eating but none of chemical weapons? Ash_F Jun 2013 #6
Everyone gets sick and dies, maybe? Too busy running away to take out a camera MADem Jun 2013 #23
You read that there were blood samples Ash_F Jun 2013 #36
Well, that video is of tests on animals, for training purposes, to MADem Jun 2013 #42
However is deployed, it needs to be aerosolized. Which is extremely visible. Ash_F Jun 2013 #43
Post the videos, then--let's have a look. I haven't seen them. MADem Jun 2013 #44
If that's what it takes to convince you Ash_F Jun 2013 #49
There was no "rush to judgment" here. MADem Jun 2013 #53
And you need CONCENTRATION happyslug Jun 2013 #54
They haven't killed that many people, according to reports. MADem Jun 2013 #56
"One nitwit desecrates a corpse..." KansDem Jun 2013 #28
They aren't munching on organs. MADem Jun 2013 #29
That brings up an interesting thought. Ash_F Jun 2013 #39
I think there has been brutality down the ages. That said, there MADem Jun 2013 #41
Oh, btw it was a lung. /nt Ash_F Jun 2013 #37
Well, I only saw the "blurred" video, and it looked rather MADem Jun 2013 #38
Well, he got his point across anyway. /nt Ash_F Jun 2013 #40
cannibalism is surprisingly common quadrature Jun 2013 #5
Well, in that case, cary on! Socal31 Jun 2013 #8
Same in the US Military. Cannibalism is rampant Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #18
Lost on this crowd. Throckmorton Jun 2013 #19
And don't even get me started on the RAF... pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #20
Some of my best friends are lumberjacks, and only a FEW of them are transvestites Clouseau2 Jun 2013 #35
Good Lord! n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #7
David Cameron, John2 Jun 2013 #9
What bothers me is the WMD, it's Iraq 2.0 flamingdem Jun 2013 #10
I think Israel is John2 Jun 2013 #13
MORSI has called for Assad to go....so Israel, Jordan and Egypt are all on the same page right now MADem Jun 2013 #25
America eats its own. Shouldn't be surprising we identify with those of a similar mindset. nt Poll_Blind Jun 2013 #11
This coming from a man whose country watched Jews getting destroyed in Warsaw, carved up Poland Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #14
They also stopped the Nazis Bonobo Jun 2013 #15
Only after the Nazis broke their non-aggression pact NickB79 Jun 2013 #32
Third Tier country John2 Jun 2013 #17
it does take a genius to spell genious correctly, though Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #22
No, but at least John2 Jun 2013 #45
Mistake done on purpose, Mr. Snarky. Welcome to the Pit. Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #55
The Soviet Union suffered casualties at least 40 times those of the US in WW2 leveymg Jun 2013 #27
We are subsidizing bankers to the tune of about $85 billion a month, so it's not like we don't have jtuck004 Jun 2013 #16
Syrian rebels are armed to the teeth! Renew Deal Jun 2013 #21
Some potential Duzys on this thread flamingdem Jun 2013 #34
Especially when it is Nanjing to Seoul John2 Jun 2013 #47
We are not arming the rebels. AngryAmish Jun 2013 #30
oy vey flamingdem Jun 2013 #31
they may be radical fundamentalist cannibals, but they are OUR radical fundamentalist cannibals yurbud Jun 2013 #46
They are McCain's John2 Jun 2013 #48
any leader who throws an oligarch in prison can't be all bad. yurbud Jun 2013 #57
I agree it is fucked up Marrah_G Jun 2013 #50
Anyone else find it weird that we rastaone Jun 2013 #51
Hypocrites! ForeignandDomestic Jun 2013 #52
OMG the rebels are eating russias *WW2 junk buyers* customers Sunlei Jun 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»West arming Syrian rebels...»Reply #41