Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
34. Oh. you perfer the Saudi Arabia type of Government, where the royal family decides who is to rule
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:05 AM
Jun 2013

That is how the other countries outside with the exceptions of Iraq and Iran decides who will rule their country. The people do not even get a voice, and it is forbidden for them to protest such selection. Iran, while the selection is limited, the people do get a say AND THEY VOTES DO COUNT. I compare it to the story I once heard about why a particular African American was voting in an election where both candidates were pro KKK. The African American acknowledge each was worse then the other. but by showing up a voting, he knew each candidate knew he voted. Politicians KNOW who vote in every election and they count of those voters. Most elections are fought over those people who always vote. The African America voter knew this and knew if he kept voting, one or the other will, sooner or later, try to get his vote. Thus by always voting he will force both candidates, to sooner or later, try to get his vote and that meant moving away from their Pro-KKK positions.

The same in Iran. The Mullahs can restrict who can run, but the voters have the final say. The Mullahs MAY not permit a candidate that the voters what to run, but the remaining candidates have to fight for those same votes. Sooner or later the will of the Voters will prevail.

Please note these are NOT elections where you get to vote for any candidate on the ballot, but only one gets on the ballot (and write in candidates are not permitted). That was the typical elections in many dictatorships (Hitler had such elections in Germany while he ruled, so did Stalin and the Soviet Union till near the end of the Soviet Union, Saddam ran similar frauds, that is NOT the case of Iran, no 99% victory for a candidate in Iran). The Iranian elections do matter and have affect on how Iran is run.

Please note, even the "Supreme Leaders" is elected. Not directly by the voters, but by the "Assembly of Experts" who themselves are directly elected by the people. Yes it is NOT direct elections, but it is still an election. It is more democratic then the rest of the Persian Gulf Emirates.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The 20% enriched uranium Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #1
And they cant buy the isotopes for medicial use from say Russia, China or some other trading cstanleytech Jun 2013 #2
Political pressure from the West ... Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #4
I am unclear on your comment regarding Russia, do they or do they not have the isotopes? cstanleytech Jun 2013 #5
It's stopped them from supplying Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #16
Fair enough even though that article says at the end cstanleytech Jun 2013 #19
Pointless WovenGems Jun 2013 #41
You looking for reasons, when the stated reason is just an excuse. happyslug Jun 2013 #7
"The reason is Iran is a functional democracy in the middle east." I would be interested on if that cstanleytech Jun 2013 #20
IRan is a sham sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #33
Oh. you perfer the Saudi Arabia type of Government, where the royal family decides who is to rule happyslug Jun 2013 #34
In Iran sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #36
This is an excellent post. Thanks. hunter Jun 2013 #63
But what about an unstable Saudi Arabia???? happyslug Jun 2013 #64
Maybe, Could be, Blah,blah,blah, Stall,Stall,stall jessie04 Jun 2013 #3
The IAEA inspects Iran's nuclear program all the time Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #6
Oh please ...read the report jessie04 Jun 2013 #9
Yes, you seem to have trouble with reading Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #15
Yeah...reading is fundamental . jessie04 Jun 2013 #22
Oooh, scary report by Yukiya Amano Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #35
"The country militarily occupying his country.." EX500rider Jun 2013 #57
Sure, and the Warsaw Pact countries were independent, too Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #59
Ecuador has diddly squat to do with Japan being "occupied" EX500rider Jun 2013 #61
The exit of US soldiers was “a triumph for national sovereignty” Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author MikeW Jun 2013 #11
the only propaganda in here is what your spreading MikeW Jun 2013 #12
I don't think you will get a response. jessie04 Jun 2013 #13
Which sites are they denied access to Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #18
Maybe they meant cstanleytech Jun 2013 #21
Sure, they want to see the Iranian Secret National Security Site... Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #42
*shrug* Perhaps you shouldnt have asked the question then. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #43
Maybe you shouldn't have mentioned a site they inspected twice already Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #45
Doesnt matter if they inspected it once, twice or a hundred times you asked what sites they had been cstanleytech Jun 2013 #53
The IAEA being denied access to a site Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #54
Israel has nothing to do with Iran denying inspectors access so enough with that red herring. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #55
Mossad is the one Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #56
"Why are they so interested in them?" jessie04 Jun 2013 #23
Well if Russia says it, it must be true! oberliner Jun 2013 #8
Have the 'pet shop boys' checked in yet? LOL eom Purveyor Jun 2013 #14
Netanyahu: Israel won't accept less than total halt of Iran's nuclear enrichment bemildred Jun 2013 #10
Israel has been saying Iran is less than 5 years away from nukes... Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #17
It's not really about the nukes, it's about Iran period. bemildred Jun 2013 #24
I respectfully disagree with you bemildred. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #25
Yes we (respectfully) do disagree. bemildred Jun 2013 #26
Well we do agree somewhat it seems on the IAEA inspections being allowed :) cstanleytech Jun 2013 #28
Well, I mean "enforced", they don't get something for nothing either. bemildred Jun 2013 #29
Oh I agree we cannot get anything from them without offering them something else up. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #30
Yes, I could see efforts on the economic side having some effect as a follow on. bemildred Jun 2013 #31
I honestly dont know if they will but it certainly cannot hurt to encourage them to do so. nt cstanleytech Jun 2013 #32
slight disagreement sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #37
I said nothing about why Iran hates Israel. bemildred Jun 2013 #38
my apologies sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #39
No problem, I am well aware of their anti-semitic attitudes. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #40
I know this is way off topic davidpdx Jun 2013 #44
Yes, it is. Pakistan too, and India, for that matter. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #46
Scary given what happened in Japan davidpdx Jun 2013 #47
All quite right, all being ignored. bemildred Jun 2013 #48
The monsoons here in Korea have really died off quite a bit davidpdx Jun 2013 #49
Well, yes, there is climate change to consider too, but all we can do is watch. bemildred Jun 2013 #50
I won't touch the stuff. Too slimy davidpdx Jun 2013 #51
I don't either, that's why I mentioned it. bemildred Jun 2013 #52
Well if they come back davidpdx Jun 2013 #58
Thank you, but they won't get a work visa without a job first. bemildred Jun 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran Is Ready to Suspend ...»Reply #34