Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raine1967

(11,674 posts)
18. This does indeed change the conversation.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 06:14 AM
Jun 2013

Government should be the ones who decide who gets these clearance and government only.

A coworker of my husband left the company for another job. He needed a security clearance. About a week after he announced he was leaving, we had a card left by a field agent from the FBI saying basically they wanted to talk to my husband -- who was listed a reference-- about his former co-worker.

That is really not a big deal -- its pretty par for the course when it comes to Gov contracting jobs like that -- what has me really curious at this point is this: did a company like USIS ask the FBI to interview my husband or is the FBI supplying that information to a private company?

This is INCREDIBLY effed up -- and this is how we have a guy like Snowden sitting in Hong Kong - with state secrets (possibly) claiming he's ready to blow the lid on a lot of things.

I hate this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

D'ya think they may have screwed up? longship Jun 2013 #1
What about his security clearance at the CIA. He worked there. Zen Democrat Jun 2013 #2
Nope. longship Jun 2013 #12
I am shocked. DURHAM D Jun 2013 #3
Yes, how did someone unwilling to betray american values get a security clearance? Right? PSPS Jun 2013 #4
Nail, THWACK, is in. delrem Jun 2013 #14
Regardless of what went wrong Iliyah Jun 2013 #5
If the only thing that came out of this is them getting rid of the damn contractors davidpdx Jun 2013 #10
Whatever they do, it's going to take... ReRe Jun 2013 #16
Ditto. I was also a little concerned about the apparent question in his job history. okaawhatever Jun 2013 #23
It seem that timdog44 Jun 2013 #6
The most Effed up thing here is this: Raine1967 Jun 2013 #7
I agree, see below for my rant davidpdx Jun 2013 #9
This pisses me off more than the allegations about the NSA davidpdx Jun 2013 #8
This is what really pisses me off as well. DURHAM D Jun 2013 #11
I think it is a very valid point davidpdx Jun 2013 #15
This does indeed change the conversation. Raine1967 Jun 2013 #18
That is interesting about your husband's co-worker davidpdx Jun 2013 #19
Fox was actually covering this! LeftInTX Jun 2013 #13
"Totally screwed up letting...er, uh,...our hero get clearance...uh, don't wanna talk about it" Kolesar Jun 2013 #17
It's not hard to get a clearance if one is truthful on the application madville Jun 2013 #20
Investigate the first firm that hired Snowden NotHardly Jun 2013 #21
Blame Cheney and Rumsfield. Cheney began the process of contracting out what previously were politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2013 #22
Why The Assumption RobinA Jun 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Firm that checked NSA lea...»Reply #18