Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,260 posts)
19. Of course he will. Because he's already said that he could never live in a country
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 06:43 PM
Jun 2013

without civil liberties. And China is so much freer than the U.S.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How do you always manage? Beat me to it I mean? Rec'd Catherina Jun 2013 #1
+1. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #16
Not charged with treason, but espionage. JimDandy Jun 2013 #77
You be right! With the sliver of the devil's hairstrand. Catherina Jun 2013 #80
He hasn't provided any proof that the NSA has "been seizing ALL American's communication data." pnwmom Jun 2013 #120
Seems like an open and shut case Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #2
Good thing we brought torturers to such swift justice. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #3
No...it's not a good thing. They should have been brought to justice Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #6
Of course you do. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #13
I don't want to fight with you Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #28
Maybe he didn't break the law. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #35
That makes no sense Shivering Jemmy Jun 2013 #59
They were two separate statements. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #63
Disclosing classified information doesn't = espionage. JW2020 Jun 2013 #4
This is a sealed criminal complaint. So I don't know what they charged him with, but... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #7
Sealed complaint. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #14
Correct Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #32
I know that. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #45
Cool Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #47
I WAS RIGHT!!! It is United States Code Section 793(d) Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #69
Semantics? Martak Sarno Jun 2013 #51
See here --->>> Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #71
Depends what he disclosed and to who. nt cstanleytech Jun 2013 #26
Incorrect JW2020 Jun 2013 #30
I guess the American public is the enemy who is now in possession of these secrets. dkf Jun 2013 #34
I'm sure the blanket "detention" warrants will be coming for the general populace villager Jun 2013 #41
Exactly right fasttense Jun 2013 #98
No, you are incorrect as it actually does depend or are you saying its ok if he disclosed to China cstanleytech Jun 2013 #37
LOL. That's propaganda. Disclosed to China? Yeah, right. Th1onein Jun 2013 #58
Snowden turned over documents to the South China Morning Post... Galraedia Jun 2013 #79
Has he admitted to this, or is it just a charge? Th1onein Jun 2013 #105
I believe cynzke Jun 2013 #124
How..............interesting. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #81
"to any person not entitled to receive it" William Seger Jun 2013 #94
Disclosing to "the American People" isn't really protected bhikkhu Jun 2013 #114
It may not be protected but it isn't espionage JW2020 Jun 2013 #115
Its ten years in jail, whatever term one wants to use bhikkhu Jun 2013 #116
Well that's the gist of this! cynzke Jun 2013 #122
Yep. They did get him with United States Code Section 793(d) Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #70
He did much more than 'disclose' information. He STOLE classified government documents. n/t Tx4obama Jun 2013 #92
B-S! Nothing learned they didn't already know - hardly a secret askeptic Jun 2013 #104
Considering Snowden stole over 1,000 classified documents... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #117
So What! cynzke Jun 2013 #125
If the US puts overt pressure on HK, Snowden will simply take the ferry to the Mainland. leveymg Jun 2013 #5
Serves us right then. BlueStater Jun 2013 #9
I'm sure that's how most of the world sees this. Falling Empire Follies. leveymg Jun 2013 #12
Of course he will. Because he's already said that he could never live in a country pnwmom Jun 2013 #19
The irony isn't lost on anyone. eom leveymg Jun 2013 #33
He'll be treated well I expect. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #76
Better buy my camera quick... rsmith6621 Jun 2013 #31
He should've quit while he was ahead. Galraedia Jun 2013 #8
Surprise surprise Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #10
Being charged doesn't mean you are guilty of something. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #20
Then he should have no problem turning himself in Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #39
Or maybe he's not an idiot. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #42
He might not want to turn himself in because he is afraid he will not get a fair totodeinhere Jun 2013 #56
Innocent until proven guilty Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #61
Do you really believe that "innocent until proven guilty" would be applied to him? totodeinhere Jun 2013 #64
With the world watching? Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #66
The world is watching Bradley Manning too but that hasn't stopped his abuse. totodeinhere Jun 2013 #72
Because in the American Justice system, only the truly guilty are ever convicted? markpkessinger Jun 2013 #62
Most of the time yes Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #65
The sheeple must NOT be informed. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #22
I guess he is my spy then. Sad. dkf Jun 2013 #36
Cue the exploding heads in 4 ... 3... 2... 1 Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #11
Why? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #17
Cancel the exploding heads! Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #24
My guess had been that he would be charged with espionage Tx4obama Jun 2013 #38
Again... Hissyspit Jun 2013 #44
I think perhaps some folks expected the Obama admin to ignore the law like the Bush admin did Tx4obama Jun 2013 #48
They could have just moved forward. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #50
oh snap! frylock Jun 2013 #57
I wish you could rec posts on this forum. /nt Ash_F Jun 2013 #95
Traitor to some. Hero to others. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #15
Yeah Hero to China PatrynXX Jun 2013 #21
I wonder if you have reflected why you are so reflexively "o.k." with your 4th Amendment Rights... NoodleyAppendage Jun 2013 #87
Yes - He Did Us All A Favor By Unmasking The Surveillance State In Such A Public Manner - Kudos cantbeserious Jun 2013 #68
+1 snappyturtle Jun 2013 #82
Bout time.... PatrynXX Jun 2013 #18
Nope. BushCo is Too Big To Jail. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #23
Friday night news dump. That's pretty slick of Obama. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #25
All part of Hope & Change, and not being like his predecessor! villager Jun 2013 #40
Actually the complaint was filed with the Court a week ago on June 14th. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #93
likely to be regarded as a hero by our allies since his "espionage" benefited them carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #27
Article excerpt from yesterday, below Tx4obama Jun 2013 #29
About freakin' time. railsback Jun 2013 #43
Seems appropriate to me. DCBob Jun 2013 #46
"Moving forward" is apparently an option. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #53
meanwhile those who murder using drones go uncharged nt msongs Jun 2013 #49
Implying that President Obama is a murderer is disgusting. n/t Tx4obama Jun 2013 #55
Your alert failed. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #67
I have not sent any alerts on any OPs or comments today, so... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #74
OK, assumed you alerted the drone post. My bad. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #75
Nope not me. A few months ago ... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #84
I think the new Jury System is a joke. I have.... Logical Jun 2013 #86
Apparently the jury did not think that the posts were that horrible. Democracy can be messy totodeinhere Jun 2013 #118
What is your euphemism for it? n/t xocet Jun 2013 #106
meanwhile those who out cia operative during war time get a pass leftyohiolib Jun 2013 #107
Thank God. That's great news, I think. MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #52
I hope that someone comes forward and offers him asylum. Obviously if totodeinhere Jun 2013 #54
I don't think a fair trial will help him. Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #73
I have no doubt he'll get asylum somewhere davidpdx Jun 2013 #96
now Americans will never know details, the case will be 'pending' for decades. Sunlei Jun 2013 #60
But first they're going to finish jailing all of the corrupt Wall Streeters who nearly wrecked the Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #78
Well, no reason left not to dump everything he has into the public sphere at this point DJ13 Jun 2013 #83
I thought he charged the US with espionage? olddad56 Jun 2013 #85
it's legal when they do it carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #99
Not surprised. Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #88
The biggest spies of all time are charging Snowden with spying. What else needs to be said? n/t Psephos Jun 2013 #89
Anybody care to explain why he shouldn't be charged with espionage alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #90
Because he's Edward Fricken Snowden gawd dammit Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #91
Care to explain why Dick Cheney shouldn't be charged? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #97
Dick Cheney should have been charged with numerous crimes alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #101
So the law shouldn't be applied equally? Hissyspit Jun 2013 #102
Do we end all valid criminal proceedings until Cheney is indicted? nt hack89 Jun 2013 #108
No, just the politically motivated ones. Hissyspit Jun 2013 #110
Nothing politically motivated about going after Snowden hack89 Jun 2013 #111
And no Democrats would fail to impeach Bush and Cheney for unconstitutional acts Hissyspit Jun 2013 #112
Snowden is not a whistleblower hack89 Jun 2013 #113
That is the crux of the issue, isn't it. berni_mccoy Jun 2013 #126
He did nothing illegal. I love weed Jun 2013 #100
So true, Edward Snowden is exposing illegal spying against the American people cpwm17 Jun 2013 #121
He leaked classified information to foreign governments, so yes, he did. phleshdef Jun 2013 #123
He should not be charged by a corrupt system that will not afford him a fair trial. totodeinhere Jun 2013 #119
All we've seen so far is part of a slide show, an interview, a court order, and naming programs.. Sancho Jun 2013 #103
They may be trying to drive him into hiding so he'll shut up! askeptic Jun 2013 #109
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Breaking: U.S. Charges Sn...»Reply #19