Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Santorum, visiting Olympia, calls for constitutional ban on same-sex marriage [View all]atreides1
(16,799 posts)47. Yes they are but...
He wants the Catholic interpretation of the Bible to be the law of the land...in other words Rick Santorum and all that think like him are traitors to the US Constitution and to the United States of America.
What I find ironic is that the Protestant churches that appear to support him have in the past often equated the Catholic church with being a cult...now they would put a Papist in the White House instead of a Mormon who hasn't quite yet decided to hop on the carzy train!
This is a perfect reason why religion and politics should always remain separated...as if history didn't have enough examples!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Santorum, visiting Olympia, calls for constitutional ban on same-sex marriage [View all]
kpete
Feb 2012
OP
I sure wish someone would ask those losers why their religious beliefs & not mine should become law
LonePirate
Feb 2012
#8
The Bible itself doesn't really support even DIFFERENT sex marriage much, if at all
Brettongarcia
Feb 2012
#42
He has to be homosexually latent IMO. He just doth protest too much. And he also
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#9
I would say that he struggles with social gender issues, and social gender roles.
boppers
Feb 2012
#68
That's fine. I was not inferring any negativity, and BTW I'm as gay as one can be.
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#69
That's why Clinton signed DOMA. During that era, there was a strong drive to pass an Amendment
pnwmom
Feb 2012
#29
Well, I didn't know that. But I think I'm still right about a Constitutional Amendment
pnwmom
Feb 2012
#57
Yeah, it's a good analogy, Santorum = McCarthy. I can't begin to imagine all of
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#61
What happened to States rights? What happened to getting the federal government out
workinclasszero
Feb 2012
#63