Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lugal Zaggesi

(366 posts)
62. The exit of US soldiers was “a triumph for national sovereignty”
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:32 PM
Jun 2013

said Ecuador's Foreign Minister Fander Falconi in 2009, when they kicked the Americans out.

http://en.mercopress.com/2009/09/19/last-us-forces-abandon-manta-military-base-in-ecuador

He also said that the lease agreement, signed in 1999, had not been properly legalized because it had only been approved by then Foreign Minister Heinz Muller and the legislature's Foreign Affairs committee, “and not by the full legislature nor all Ecuadorians”. It's best to push these SOFA agreements through with as few people as possible - e.g. when the entire Iraqi Parliament got involved in 2008, they voted to kick the Americans out in 2011.

Many Japanese people are hopeful that they can get rid of their rightwing government, and their American military bases, just like the Philippines managed to do:

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/11/23/national/philippine-rejection-of-u-s-bases-an-example-for-activists/#.UcYCkDRwrK0

The US Empire of Military bases (over 700 in over 130 countries) is winding down as WWII fades into history:
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/27/chalmers_johnson_nemesis_the_last_days

When China forces the US to accept military bases later this century,
we'll stick them in Texas, since most Americans hate Texans.
No matter how much Texans complain and whine, California and New York and the rest of old America will work with Beijing to limit their hated military bases to one small portion of USofA - and gladly pay the "protection money" demanded by China, to keep the bases "out of sight, out of mind". I never liked Houston, anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The 20% enriched uranium Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #1
And they cant buy the isotopes for medicial use from say Russia, China or some other trading cstanleytech Jun 2013 #2
Political pressure from the West ... Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #4
I am unclear on your comment regarding Russia, do they or do they not have the isotopes? cstanleytech Jun 2013 #5
It's stopped them from supplying Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #16
Fair enough even though that article says at the end cstanleytech Jun 2013 #19
Pointless WovenGems Jun 2013 #41
You looking for reasons, when the stated reason is just an excuse. happyslug Jun 2013 #7
"The reason is Iran is a functional democracy in the middle east." I would be interested on if that cstanleytech Jun 2013 #20
IRan is a sham sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #33
Oh. you perfer the Saudi Arabia type of Government, where the royal family decides who is to rule happyslug Jun 2013 #34
In Iran sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #36
This is an excellent post. Thanks. hunter Jun 2013 #63
But what about an unstable Saudi Arabia???? happyslug Jun 2013 #64
Maybe, Could be, Blah,blah,blah, Stall,Stall,stall jessie04 Jun 2013 #3
The IAEA inspects Iran's nuclear program all the time Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #6
Oh please ...read the report jessie04 Jun 2013 #9
Yes, you seem to have trouble with reading Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #15
Yeah...reading is fundamental . jessie04 Jun 2013 #22
Oooh, scary report by Yukiya Amano Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #35
"The country militarily occupying his country.." EX500rider Jun 2013 #57
Sure, and the Warsaw Pact countries were independent, too Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #59
Ecuador has diddly squat to do with Japan being "occupied" EX500rider Jun 2013 #61
The exit of US soldiers was “a triumph for national sovereignty” Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author MikeW Jun 2013 #11
the only propaganda in here is what your spreading MikeW Jun 2013 #12
I don't think you will get a response. jessie04 Jun 2013 #13
Which sites are they denied access to Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #18
Maybe they meant cstanleytech Jun 2013 #21
Sure, they want to see the Iranian Secret National Security Site... Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #42
*shrug* Perhaps you shouldnt have asked the question then. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #43
Maybe you shouldn't have mentioned a site they inspected twice already Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #45
Doesnt matter if they inspected it once, twice or a hundred times you asked what sites they had been cstanleytech Jun 2013 #53
The IAEA being denied access to a site Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #54
Israel has nothing to do with Iran denying inspectors access so enough with that red herring. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #55
Mossad is the one Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #56
"Why are they so interested in them?" jessie04 Jun 2013 #23
Well if Russia says it, it must be true! oberliner Jun 2013 #8
Have the 'pet shop boys' checked in yet? LOL eom Purveyor Jun 2013 #14
Netanyahu: Israel won't accept less than total halt of Iran's nuclear enrichment bemildred Jun 2013 #10
Israel has been saying Iran is less than 5 years away from nukes... Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #17
It's not really about the nukes, it's about Iran period. bemildred Jun 2013 #24
I respectfully disagree with you bemildred. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #25
Yes we (respectfully) do disagree. bemildred Jun 2013 #26
Well we do agree somewhat it seems on the IAEA inspections being allowed :) cstanleytech Jun 2013 #28
Well, I mean "enforced", they don't get something for nothing either. bemildred Jun 2013 #29
Oh I agree we cannot get anything from them without offering them something else up. cstanleytech Jun 2013 #30
Yes, I could see efforts on the economic side having some effect as a follow on. bemildred Jun 2013 #31
I honestly dont know if they will but it certainly cannot hurt to encourage them to do so. nt cstanleytech Jun 2013 #32
slight disagreement sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #37
I said nothing about why Iran hates Israel. bemildred Jun 2013 #38
my apologies sabbat hunter Jun 2013 #39
No problem, I am well aware of their anti-semitic attitudes. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #40
I know this is way off topic davidpdx Jun 2013 #44
Yes, it is. Pakistan too, and India, for that matter. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #46
Scary given what happened in Japan davidpdx Jun 2013 #47
All quite right, all being ignored. bemildred Jun 2013 #48
The monsoons here in Korea have really died off quite a bit davidpdx Jun 2013 #49
Well, yes, there is climate change to consider too, but all we can do is watch. bemildred Jun 2013 #50
I won't touch the stuff. Too slimy davidpdx Jun 2013 #51
I don't either, that's why I mentioned it. bemildred Jun 2013 #52
Well if they come back davidpdx Jun 2013 #58
Thank you, but they won't get a work visa without a job first. bemildred Jun 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran Is Ready to Suspend ...»Reply #62